跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究高维共同因子模型的因子数量估计,对应因子模型方向,但未说明宏观实证应用。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Jianqing Fan
Jianhua Guo
Shurong Zheng

通过调整特征值阈值估计因子数量

研究问题
高维因子模型中,观测变量尺度异质使协方差特征值难以比较时,如何利用相关矩阵更可靠地确定共同因子的数量?
方法与思路
作者转向相关矩阵,利用随机矩阵理论修正顶部样本特征值的偏差并考虑估计误差,提出调整相关阈值法 ACT。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称在一定条件下总体相关矩阵大于一的特征值数量等于共同因子数,并建立方法在最小信号强度与阈值方面的最优性。
阅读关注点
应核对因子结构及所谓温和条件,确认总体特征值关系的适用范围,并检查偏差修正、信号强度标准和阈值最优性的定义。
阅读边界
依据 arXiv 1909.10710v1 预印本摘要,不能据此认定已同行评审或期刊接收;具体理论条件及后续刊本变化未提供。

原文摘要

Determining the number of common factors is an important and practical topic in high dimensional factor models. The existing literatures are mainly based on the eigenvalues of the covariance matrix. Due to the incomparability of the eigenvalues of the covariance matrix caused by heterogeneous scales of observed variables, it is very difficult to give an accurate relationship between these eigenvalues and the number of common factors. To overcome this limitation, we appeal to the correlation matrix and show surprisingly that the number of eigenvalues greater than $1$ of population correlation matrix is the same as the number of common factors under some mild conditions. To utilize such a relationship, we study the random matrix theory based on the sample correlation matrix in order to correct the biases in estimating the top eigenvalues and to take into account of estimation errors in eigenvalue estimation. This leads us to propose adjusted correlation thresholding (ACT) for determining the number of common factors in high dimensional factor models, taking into account the sampling variabilities and biases of top sample eigenvalues. We also establish the optimality of the proposed methods in terms of minimal signal strength and optimal threshold. Simulation studies lend further support to our proposed method and show that our estimator outperforms other competing methods in most of our testing cases.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文