The choice of variables in multivariate regression: a non-conjugate Bayesian decision theory approach
多元回归变量选择的非共轭贝叶斯决策论方法AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论通用多元回归变量选择及光谱应用,未涉及给定的经济或金融细分研究对象。
多元回归变量选择的非共轭贝叶斯决策论方法AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
We consider the choice of explanatory variables in multivariate linear regression. Our approach balances prediction accuracy against costs attached to variables in a multivariate version of a decision theory approach pioneered by Lindley (1968). We also employ a non-conjugate proper prior distribution for the parameters of the regression model, extending the standard normal-inverse Wishart by adding a component of error which is unexplainable by any number of predictor variables, thus avoiding the determinism identified by Dawid (1988). Simulated annealing and fast updating algorithms are used to search for good subsets when there are very many regressors. The technique is illustrated on a near infrared spectroscopy example involving 39 observations and 300 explanatory variables. This demonstrates the effectiveness of multivariate regression as opposed to separate univariate regressions. It also emphasises that within a Bayesian framework more variables than observations can be utilised.