跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究有时间依赖的序列及其子抽样、区块自助推断。

反馈分类问题

Fixed b Subsampling and the Block Bootstrap: Improved Confidence Sets based on p -Value Calibration

固定 b 子抽样与区块自助法:基于 p 值校准的改进置信集

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Xiaofeng Shao

固定 b 子抽样与区块自助法:基于 p 值校准的改进置信集

研究问题
时间序列子抽样和区块自助法的推断结果会受窗口或区块大小影响,如何在渐近分析中体现并校准这种影响?
方法与思路
作者在固定 b 渐近框架下推导子抽样及移动区块自助法的 p 值零假设分布,据此校准传统置信集和检验。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,该框架覆盖有限维及部分无限维参数;模拟中校准置信集的覆盖误差通常更小,分布近似也更准确。
阅读关注点
应核对固定 b 的定义、时间依赖条件、极限分布是否含未知量,以及不同参数对象所需的具体校准步骤。
阅读边界
仅依据所给 Crossref 摘要;模拟优势不能视为所有时间序列和带宽下的保证,适用条件及数值结果未说明。

原文摘要

Summary Subsampling and block-based bootstrap methods have been used in a wide range of inference problems for time series. To accommodate the dependence, these resampling methods involve a bandwidth parameter, such as the subsampling window width and block size in the block-based bootstrap. In empirical work, using different bandwidth parameters could lead to different inference results, but traditional first-order asymptotic theory does not capture the choice of the bandwidth. We propose to adopt the fixed b approach, as advocated by Kiefer and Vogelsang in the heteroscedasticity–auto-correlation robust testing context, to account for the influence of the bandwidth on inference. Under the fixed b asymptotic framework, we derive the asymptotic null distribution of the p-values for subsampling and the moving block bootstrap, and further propose a calibration of the traditional small-b-based confidence intervals (regions or bands) and tests. Our treatment is fairly general as it includes both finite dimensional parameters and infinite dimensional parameters, such as the marginal distribution function. Simulation results show that the fixed b approach is more accurate than the traditional small b approach in terms of approximating the finite sample distribution, and that the calibrated confidence sets tend to have smaller coverage errors than the uncalibrated counterparts.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文