跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究医疗生存数据的治愈分类评价,并未涉及经济行为离散选择或所列其他细分,不能因二元分类而归入离散选择。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
M Amico
I Van Keilegom
B Han

利用 ROC 曲线评估生存数据中的治愈状态预测

研究问题
生存数据中的删失使治愈状态部分不可观测,如何评价标记变量对治愈与未治愈状态的分类能力,并构造适用的 ROC 曲线?
方法与思路
作者利用条件概率分解敏感度和特异度,以混合治愈模型计算权重,再用加权经验分布估计处理删失的 ROC 曲线。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称该估计量可评价治愈状态分类,模拟表现良好,并与完全观测状态下及传统生存分析的 ROC 方法比较,另作乳腺癌应用。
阅读关注点
应核对治愈状态与删失机制的假设、混合治愈模型如何提供权重,以及权重估计误差如何影响 ROC 曲线和不确定性评估。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要;治愈比例的识别条件、模型误设影响及具体模拟结果未说明,不能据此判断临床预测有效性或其他版本变化。

原文摘要

Summary Survival analysis relies on the hypothesis that, if the follow-up is long enough, the event of interest will eventually be observed for all observations. This assumption, however, is often not realistic. The survival data then contain a cure fraction. A common approach to modelling and analysing this type of data consists in using cure models. Two types of information can therefore be obtained: the survival at a given time and the cure status, both possibly modelled as a function of the covariates. The cure status is often of interest to medical practitioners, and one is usually interested in predicting it based on markers. Receiver operating characteristic, Roc, curves are one way to evaluate the predicted performance; however, the classical Roc curve method is not appropriate since the cure status is partially unobserved due to the presence of censoring in survival data. We propose a Roc curve estimator that aims to evaluate the cured/noncured status classification performance from cure survival data. This estimator, which handles the presence of censoring, decomposes sensitivity and specificity by means of the definition of conditional probability, and estimates these two quantities by means of weighted empirical distribution functions. The mixture cure model is used to calculate the weights. Based on simulations, we demonstrate good performance of the proposed method, and compare it with the classical Roc curve nonparametric estimator that would be obtained if the cure status was fully observed. We also compare our proposed method with the Roc curves of Heagerty et al. (2000) for classical survival analysis. Finally, we illustrate the methodology on a breast cancer dataset.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文