跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究流行病常微分方程模型的参数可识别性,未提供所列经济计量细分方向的直接依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Q. Y. Chen
Z. Rapti
Y. Drossinos
J. Cuevas-Maraver
G. A. Kevrekidis
P. G. Kevrekidis

分舱流行病模型的实际可识别性与参数估计

研究问题
在带噪声的流行病观测中,未知初始条件如何影响常微分方程分舱模型的实际参数可识别性,以及不同估计方法的参数与预测表现?
方法与思路
作者使用两个流行病模型的加噪模拟数据,比较最大似然、MCMC 等估计方法,并改变未直接测量的初始条件及峰前、峰后观测时段。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,所考察 MCMC 估计整体更稳健,固定部分初始条件的收益依模型而异;结果也显示观测时段和较强噪声会影响参数估计质量。
阅读关注点
应核对结构与实际可识别性的判据、噪声机制、初始条件固定值的来源,以及 MCMC 先验、收敛诊断和方法比较采用的误差标准。
阅读边界
这是 arXiv 预印本,同行评审及期刊接收未核验。结论来自特定模型与加噪模拟;摘要未给出噪声强度及完整设计,不能推广为结构可识别性普遍无用。

原文摘要

Practical parameter identifiability in ODE-based epidemiological models is a known issue, yet one that merits further study. It is essentially ubiquitous due to noise and errors in real data. In this study, to avoid uncertainty stemming from data of unknown quality, simulated data with added noise are used to investigate practical identifiability in two distinct epidemiological models. Particular emphasis is placed on the role of initial conditions, which are assumed unknown, except those that are directly measured. Instead of just focusing on one method of estimation, we use and compare results from various broadly used methods, including maximum likelihood and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) estimation. Among other findings, our analysis revealed that the MCMC estimator is overall more robust than the point estimators considered. Its estimates and predictions are improved when the initial conditions of certain compartments are fixed so that the model becomes globally identifiable. For the point estimators, whether fixing or fitting the that are not directly measured improves parameter estimates is model-dependent. Specifically, in the standard SEIR model, fixing the initial condition for the susceptible population S(0) improved parameter estimates, while this was not true when fixing the initial condition of the asymptomatic population in a more involved model. Our study corroborates the change in quality of parameter estimates upon usage of pre-peak or post-peak time-series under consideration. Finally, our examples suggest that in the presence of significantly noisy data, the value of structural identifiability is moot.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文