The Equivalence of Two Corrections to the Approximate Mean of an Entry in a Contingency Table
列联表单元近似均值的两种修正之间的等价性AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论通用列联表矩近似及偏差修正,未明确对应所列经济计量领域细分。
反馈分类问题列联表单元近似均值的两种修正之间的等价性AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Stevens (1951) gives approximate expressions for the conditional mean and variance of an entry in a contingency table with fixed marginals. Cornfield (1956) shows these to be the moments of the asymptotic normal approximation to the noncentral hypergeometric distribution. McCullagh (1984) and Levin (1984) suggest corrections to the expression for the mean. We show that the bias correction preferred by Levin for the conditional case is virtually identical to that derived by Gart (1985a) for the unconditional case. This correction is based on Bartlett's (1955) general results for score statistics. Related theory (Bartlett, 1953) yields Stevens's approximate variance formula and an expression for the third central moment.