Minimum Resource Threshold Policy Under Partial Interference
部分干扰下的最低资源阈值政策AI 解读 ↓
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明
本页整理公开书目信息，不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成，未完成全文核验，可能有误；具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本，未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要；缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录，不合计多个记录；关联记录可能包含正式发表版本，不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零，引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配，同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列，再参考通用方法与发表日期。
分类依据与纠错
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类：摘要明确研究治疗分配政策，并将组内干扰和溢出效应纳入估计目标。
反馈分类问题
正在核对关联版本…
代码、数据与补充材料
正在核对对应版本的资源…
部分干扰下的最低资源阈值政策
- 研究问题
- 当组内治疗具有溢出效应时，如何估计使组级结局达到预设目标所需的最低治疗比例，并据此制定资源分配政策？
- 方法与思路
- 作者提出最低资源阈值政策，以新的非参数双重稳健损失进行经验风险最小化，并通过超额风险界刻画估计性质。
- 材料陈述的贡献
- 摘要称，该方法兼顾组内干扰和结局目标，并在塞内加尔水、卫生与清洁资源分配应用中展示相对比较政策的优势。
- 阅读关注点
- 应核对部分干扰和政策识别条件、阈值可达性、双重稳健损失及风险界，以及实际应用中比较政策与评估指标。
- 阅读边界
- 仅依据稿件版本未注明的OpenAlex索引摘要。识别条件、风险界形式和比较数值未说明，所述政策优势不能外推到其他人群或资源场景。
原文摘要
When developing policies for prevention of infectious diseases, policymakers often set specific, outcome-oriented targets to achieve. For example, when developing a vaccine allocation policy, policymakers may want to distribute them so that at least a certain fraction of individuals in a census block are disease-free and spillover effects due to interference within blocks are accounted for. The article proposes methods to estimate a block-level treatment policy that achieves a predefined, outcome-oriented target while accounting for spillover effects due to interference. Our policy, the minimum resource threshold policy (MRTP), suggests the minimum fraction of treated units required within a block to meet or exceed the target level of the outcome. We estimate the MRTP from empirical risk minimization using a novel, nonparametric, doubly robust loss function. We then characterize statistical properties of the estimated MRTP in terms of the excess risk bound. We apply our methodology to design a water, sanitation, and hygiene allocation policy for Senegal with the goal of increasing the proportion of households with no children experiencing diarrhea to a level exceeding a specified threshold. Our policy outperforms competing policies and offers new approaches to design allocation policies, especially in international development for communicable diseases. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.