Some Stochastic Versions of the Matrix Model for Population Dynamics
人口动态矩阵模型的若干随机版本AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究人口学矩阵预测,未提供足以明确归入所列宏观预测或其他计量细分的文本依据。
反馈分类问题人口动态矩阵模型的若干随机版本AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
In an effort to provide probabilistic measures of the accuracy of population projections, stochastic models for population growth are defined from the classical discrete deterministic model by assuming respectively that (1) the deterministic model is subject to additive random errors; (2) the elements of the transition matrix represent probabilities, rather than rates; and (3) the transition matrices are random variables. The mean of each process is shown to reproduce the deterministic process, while the variance can be expressed as the weighted sum of one-step conditional variances. For the second model, these “innovation variances” will be small for large populations, while for the first and third models their size will depend on the observed variability of, respectively, prediction errors and vital rates. Since it is known empirically that both the latter are quite variable, these models could be expected to yield relatively high prediction variances, and this expectation is confirmed by a numerical example. The first model seems unsatisfactory as demographic theory, while the second does not account for the observed imprecision of population projections. The third model does, however, seem to provide a satisfactory method of estimating prediction variances of population projections.