Power of the lack-of-fit test in designed experiments: Guidance on sample size and the distribution of replicates
设计实验中失拟检验的功效:样本量与重复观测分配指南AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究正态线性模型的失拟检验与实验重复配置,未涉及因果效应识别或其他所列经济计量细分的明确问题。
反馈分类问题设计实验中失拟检验的功效:样本量与重复观测分配指南AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Although there exists substantial literature on lack-of-fit tests for normal linear models, there is scant literature for determining the number or distribution of points to replicate when starting with an un-replicated base design like a factorial, response surface, or related constructions. In this article, we provide an easy-to-implement approach to determining power and sample size based on the standard lack-of-fit test. The method employs simply stated bounds on the null model in order to obtain the non-centrality parameter. We also explore the effect of different patterns of replication on power. Our approach results in guidelines for augmentation of designed experiments. For example, we show that, as the replications increase, the non-centrality parameter grows without bound if and only if the number of replicated treatments is greater than the number of terms in the null model. We also find guidelines for the standard practice of placing all replicates at the center point in factorial-type experiments with continuous factors. Although our approach is not restricted to any particular class of designs, we emphasize factorial, screening and response surface designs.