跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要的核心是类别数据后验计算,广告应用未明确建立经济离散选择模型。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
James E. Johndrow
Aaron Smith
Natesh Pillai
David B. Dunson

不平衡类别数据的MCMC计算

研究问题
为什么极不平衡类别数据下某些数据增广MCMC算法计算表现很差,而Metropolis方法可能更有效,其复杂度差异如何解释?
方法与思路
作者针对高度不平衡二元数据,推导常用数据增广与随机游走Metropolis的计算复杂度,比较目标密度与步长的集中速率。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称在所研究极不平衡情形,Metropolis复杂度随样本量呈对数增长,数据增广呈多项式增长,并解释相关失效机制。
阅读关注点
应核对复杂度的衡量标准、不平衡程度随样本量变化的设定,以及随机游走理论与广告应用中自适应Metropolis的联系。
阅读边界
来源为版本未注明的OpenAlex摘要;结论针对特定不平衡渐近情形,具体模型与复杂度定义未提供,不能推广到所有MCMC。

原文摘要

Many modern applications collect highly imbalanced categorical data, with some categories relatively rare. Bayesian hierarchical models combat data sparsity by borrowing information, while also quantifying uncertainty. However, posterior computation presents a fundamental barrier to routine use; a single class of algorithms does not work well in all settings and practitioners waste time trying different types of Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approaches. This article was motivated by an application to quantitative advertising in which we encountered extremely poor computational performance for data augmentation MCMC algorithms but obtained excellent performance for adaptive Metropolis. To obtain a deeper understanding of this behavior, we derive theoretical results on the computational complexity of commonly used data augmentation algorithms and the Random Walk Metropolis algorithm for highly imbalanced binary data. In this regime, our results show computational complexity of Metropolis is logarithmic in sample size, while data augmentation is polynomial in sample size. The root cause of this poor performance of data augmentation is a discrepancy between the rates at which the target density and MCMC step sizes concentrate. Our methods also show that MCMC algorithms that exhibit a similar discrepancy will fail in large samples—a result with substantial practical impact. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组