跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦差分隐私下的统计效用与回归推断,行政及调查数据本身不足以支持所列领域分类。

反馈分类问题

A Feasibility Study of Differentially Private Summary Statistics and Regression Analyses with Evaluations on Administrative and Survey Data

差分隐私汇总统计与回归分析的可行性:行政及调查数据评估

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Aaron R. Williams
Joshua Snoke
Claire McKay Bowen

差分隐私汇总统计与回归分析的可行性:行政及调查数据评估

研究问题
在不直接开放保密微观数据的情况下,差分隐私统计查询能否支持公共政策分析,尤其能否提供准确回归估计与置信区间?
方法与思路
作者调整已有差分隐私回归方法以适配新数据类型并返回标准误,使用税务行政数据及公开调查数据,从多项效用指标评估可行性。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称简单单变量统计具有可行性,但准确回归估计和置信区间仍面临困难;研究还识别了可能挑战隐私方法的具体数据特征。
阅读关注点
应核对隐私预算与查询设定、回归方法及标准误构造、效用指标,以及不同数据特征如何影响误差和政策分析结论。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明,不能推断刊本变化;摘要未列隐私预算或误差数值,可行性结论不能外推至所有数据。

原文摘要

Federal administrative data, such as tax data, are invaluable for research, but because of privacy concerns, access to these data is typically limited to select agencies and a few individuals. An alternative to sharing microlevel data is to allow individuals to query statistics without directly accessing the confidential data. This article studies the feasibility of using differentially private (DP) methods to make certain queries while preserving privacy. We also include new methodological adaptations to existing DP regression methods for using new data types and returning standard error estimates. We define feasibility as the impact of DP methods on analyses for making public policy decisions and the queries accuracy according to several utility metrics. We evaluate the methods using Internal Revenue Service data and public-use Current Population Survey data and identify how specific data features might challenge some of these methods. Our findings show that DP methods are feasible for simple, univariate statistics but struggle to produce accurate regression estimates and confidence intervals. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive statistical study of DP regression methodology on real, complex datasets, and the findings have significant implications for the direction of a growing research field and public policy. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文