跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要核心为复杂调查抽样下的通用检验,逻辑回归应用不足以归入离散选择。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Jae Kwang Kim
J. N. K. Rao
Zhonglei Wang

利用自助法权重检验复杂调查数据假设:统一方法

研究问题
复杂调查中的不等抽样概率、聚类等设计特征会扭曲检验水平,如何在无需估计协方差矩阵或设计效应的情况下进行检验?
方法与思路
作者用自助法权重近似准似然比和准得分统计量,并建立渐近有效性;同时构造列联表拟合优度与独立性的检验程序。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,模拟中的第一类错误率比朴素似然比及准得分检验更接近名义水平,并提供教育调查的逻辑回归应用。
阅读关注点
应核对自助法权重怎样反映调查设计、渐近有效性的条件,以及参数检验与列联表检验的统计量和实施步骤是否不同。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;具体抽样设计、权重生成条件及误差率数值未说明,不能推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

Standard statistical methods without taking proper account of the complexity of a survey design can lead to erroneous inferences when applied to survey data due to unequal selection probabilities, clustering, and other design features. In particular, the Type I error rates of hypotheses tests using standard methods can be much larger than the nominal significance level. Methods incorporating design features in testing hypotheses have been proposed, including Wald tests and quasi-score tests that involve estimated covariance matrices of parameter estimates. In this article, we present a unified approach to hypothesis testing without requiring estimated covariance matrices or design effects, by constructing bootstrap approximations to quasi-likelihood ratio statistics and quasi-score statistics and establishing its asymptotic validity. The proposed method can be easily implemented without a specific software designed for complex survey sampling. We also consider hypothesis testing for categorical data and present a bootstrap procedure for testing simple goodness of fit and independence in a two-way table. In simulation studies, the Type I error rates of the proposed approach are much closer to their nominal significance level compared with the naive likelihood ratio test and quasi-score test. An application to an educational survey under a logistic regression model is also presented. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文