Structured Bayesian Modeling of Dynamic Receptive1 Fields in Salamander Retinal Ganglion Cells
蝾螈视网膜神经节细胞动态感受野的结构化贝叶斯建模AI 解读 ↓
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明
本页整理公开书目信息，不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成，未完成全文核验，可能有误；具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本，未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要；缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本；arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历，都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对，只展示已核实例，档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录，不合计多个记录；关联记录可能包含正式发表版本，不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零，引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配，同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列，再参考通用方法与发表日期。
分类依据与纠错
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类：研究对象是神经感受野，现有计量领域细分没有直接对应项。
反馈分类问题
正在核对关联版本…
代码、数据与补充材料
正在核对对应版本的资源…
关注这篇论文的作者
蝾螈视网膜神经节细胞动态感受野的结构化贝叶斯建模
- 研究问题
- 在试验次数有限、像素与时间维度很高时，如何估计空间连贯且时间平滑的神经感受野，并概括细胞间的响应差异？
- 方法与思路
- 作者将泊松模型与空间高斯马尔可夫随机场、时间自回归过程结合，逐个神经元估计感受野，再聚类空间平均后的时间响应。
- 材料陈述的贡献
- 摘要称该模型恢复了更连贯的感受野，并得到三类时间响应。模拟中恢复和估计准确度较好，但 LASSO 的假阳性控制更好。
- 阅读关注点
- 应核对时空先验、后验计算与参数选择，比较方法是否公平，以及空间平均和聚类如何影响细胞类型的解释与稳定性。
- 阅读边界
- 这是 arXiv 预印本，同行评审和期刊接收未经核实。摘要未说明完整计算细节，所述效果不能直接推广到其他神经系统。
原文摘要
Neurons in the visual system are selective for specific spatial and temporal stimulus features, described by their \emph{receptive field}. Estimating one means a coefficient per pixel per time bin from few trials -- a high-dimensional problem requiring regularization. Sparse regularizers such as the LASSO handle the dimension but select pixels independently at each time point, with nothing to keep the region coherent in space or smooth in time; it can fragment or reorganize discontinuously even when the true response evolves smoothly, a failure since this evolving pattern is what a receptive-field estimate should capture. We formulate dynamic receptive-field estimation as a high-dimensional Bayesian problem: a Poisson model combining a Gaussian Markov random field in space with an autoregressive process in time, so the estimated field is smooth and coherent across space and time. On recordings from $155$ salamander retinal ganglion cells, fitting this model independently per neuron recovers a coherent surface, where a pixel-level Poisson-LASSO comparison instead returns a fragmented one. Summarizing each neuron's surface by its space-averaged temporal response and clustering these curves with a model-based functional-clustering procedure, BIC selects three balanced temporal-response phenotypes ($85$, $32$, $38$ neurons), against a degenerate grouping from clustering the raw surfaces. A simulation study with known ground truth confirms the same pattern, with the model beating an unregularized Poisson GLM, LASSO, and the elastic net on recovery and estimation accuracy, though LASSO controls false positives better. The per-neuron field identification, its contrast with LASSO, and the functional-clustering population typing constitute this paper's contribution.