跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究调查选择与总体比例估计,虽使用因果机制表述,但未研究干预效应或其他列出的具体方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Jonathan Auerbach

有多少联邦雇员不满意?利用调查回应时间估计总体比例

研究问题
当被调查特征本身直接影响参与意愿时,如何利用回应时间估计总体比例,并分析传统后分层难以消除的调查不回应偏差?
方法与思路
作者在调查变量致因模型下刻画受访者进入调查的时间,借助计数过程方法估计总体比例,并应用于联邦雇员工作满意度调查。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要提出依赖不同于后分层假设的偏差分析方法,并报告其模型提示:样本即使后分层后,仍可能高估总体不满意比例。
阅读关注点
应核对回应时间如何识别总体比例、未回应者的处理方式,以及计数过程模型假设、后分层比较和结论对模型设定的敏感性。
阅读边界
这是 arXiv 预印本,同行评审及期刊接收未核实。不满意者选择参与是模型支持的解释,摘要未说明识别条件、真实总体比例或估计数值。

原文摘要

We propose a statistical model to estimate population proportions under the survey variable cause model (Groves 2006), the setting in which the characteristic measured by the survey has a direct causal effect on survey participation. For example, we estimate employee satisfaction from a survey in which the decision of an employee to participate depends on their satisfaction. We model the time at which a respondent 'arrives' to take the survey, leveraging results from the counting processes literature that has been developed to analyze similar problems with survival data. Our approach is particularly useful for nonresponse bias analysis because it relies on different assumptions than traditional adjustments such as poststratification, which assumes the common cause model, the setting in which external factors explain the characteristic measured by the survey and participation. Our motivation is the Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey, which asks federal employees whether they are satisfied with their work organization. Our model suggests that the sample proportion overestimates the proportion of federal employees that are not satisfied with their work organization even after adjustment by poststratification. Employees that are not satisfied likely select into the survey, and this selection cannot be explained by personal characteristics like race, gender, and occupation or work-place characteristics like agency, unit, and location.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文