跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究倾向得分加权、混杂控制与因果参数偏差,直接属于因果推断。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Richard Wyss
Ben B. Hansen
Georg Hahn
Lars van der Laan
Kueiyu Joshua Lin

倾向得分加权中的欠平滑LASSO与合成负对照暴露偏差检测

研究问题
高维倾向得分加权中,如何在有效影响函数未知时选择LASSO的欠平滑程度,并识别因已测混杂控制不足产生的偏差?
方法与思路
作者用协变量平衡指标选择较弱正则化,并构造合成负对照暴露检测潜在偏差,通过数值研究评估有限样本表现。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要提出平衡调参与偏差诊断框架,并称合成负对照可发现可能违反部分可交换性的分析,同时承认平衡不保证偏差最小。
阅读关注点
核对欠平滑的选择规则、合成负对照的生成条件和检测依据,并区分协变量平衡、偏差检测与因果识别各自提供的保证。
阅读边界
这是arXiv预印本,同行评审或期刊接收未核实;摘要未给出诊断误报率,也未声称方法能排除未测混杂或保证无偏。

原文摘要

The propensity score (PS) is often used to control for large numbers of covariates in high-dimensional healthcare database studies. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) has become the most widely used tool for fitting large-scale PS models in these settings. LASSO uses L1 regularized regression to prevent overfitting by shrinking coefficients toward zero (setting some exactly to zero). The degree of regularization is typically selected using cross-validation to minimize out-of-sample prediction error. Both theory and simulations have shown, however, that when using LASSO models for PS weighting, less regularization is needed to minimize bias in PS weighted estimators. This is referred to as undersmoothing the LASSO model, where the optimal degree of undersmoothing can be derived from the target causal parameter's efficient influence function. In many settings, however, the efficient influence function is unknown or difficult to derive. Here, we consider the use of balance metrics as a simple and generally applicable approach to select the degree of undersmoothing when the efficient influence function is unknown. Because LASSO models that are tuned using balance metrics alone are not assured to minimize bias in PS weighted estimators -- as such metrics are blind to the efficient influence function -- we propose a framework to generate synthetic negative control exposures for bias detection. We show that synthetic negative control exposures can identify analyses that likely violate partial exchangeability due to lack of control for measured confounding. Finally, we use a series of numerical studies to investigate the finite sample performance of using balance criteria to undersmooth LASSO PS-weighted estimators, and the use of synthetic negative control exposures to detect biased analyses.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文