跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究一般多元回归曲面的平滑和偏导估计,地下水与土层应用未对应所列计量细分方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
A. S. Azari
Hans-Georg Muller

用于曲面平滑与偏导估计的预平均局部正交多项式估计量

研究问题
如何在固定设计回归中估计平滑多元曲面及其偏导,同时自动处理边界效应,并通过预平均降低计算成本?
方法与思路
作者以局部正交多项式级数估计量的乘积构造曲面估计,结合预平均与边界修正,并讨论两个平滑参数的选择。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称在充分光滑等条件下,边界修正使全局平均均方误差达到内部点的最优收敛率,且预平均可明显加快计算。
阅读关注点
应核对支持集边界与曲面光滑性的条件、偏导估计理论、两个参数的误差与成本权衡,以及不规则设计和克里金比较。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;具体正则条件与数值未给出,预平均存在精度代价,应用比较不能证明普遍优越或刊本变化。

原文摘要

We propose a multivariate smoothing method based on products of localized orthogonal polynomial series estimators for a smooth regression surface in the fixed-design regression model. The estimation of partial derivatives is included. The proposed method provides for automatic and efficient boundary modifications near the edges of the surface, assuming that the boundary of the support of the regression function satisfies some regularity conditions. By allowing for a preaveraging step, the corresponding algorithms are speeded up considerably and are easy to implement. Computation of special boundary kernels, as required by the kernel method to avoid edge effects, is not necessary. It is shown that under sufficient smoothness assumptions, the global average mean squared error has the same optimal rate of convergence as the mean squared error at an interior point; that is, the boundary correction is asymptotically effective. The method depends on two smoothing parameters, one determining the amount of preaveraging and the other determining the amount of smoothing after preaveraging. Theoretical and practical bounds for the choice of these parameters are discussed. A Monte Carlo study based on a bivariate Gaussian surface indicates that increasing the preaveraging parameter δ has a negative effect on the average mean squared error, which is not unexpected. On the other hand, larger values of δ are computationally more economical. The effects of boundary correction as compared to noncorrected estimates are investigated for the example of a quadratic surface. The numerical complexity of the proposed method is discussed. The methods are demonstrated and compared to kriging for two data sets, one on nonuniformly measured groundwater levels in Arizona and the other on cover-clay thickness data from Iran measured on a regular mesh. The two data analyses include regular and irregular designs and supports; they seem to indicate that the method works well, particularly when compared to kriging.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文