Combining Data from Polymerase Chain Reaction DNA Typing Experiments: Applications to Sperm Typing Data
合并 PCR DNA 分型实验数据:精子分型的应用AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要涉及遗传重组与实验测量错误的一般统计建模,没有明确对应所列经济计量细分。
反馈分类问题合并 PCR DNA 分型实验数据:精子分型的应用AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a procedure by which the DNA in a single cell can be made to replicate many times in a test tube. By amplifying the DNA from individual sperm cells and typing the results, estimates of male recombination fractions can be made, which are valuable for creating genetic maps and locating regions of unusually intense crossover activity on the human genome. Because PCR typing results are subject to random error, stochastic models must be constructed to obtain accurate results. In practice, to obtain enough information to accurately estimate small recombination fractions, it is necessary to combine data from several PCR experiments. Stochastic models in common use assume that PCR error rates are constant across experiments. We show by analysis of a dataset that PCR error rates can vary considerably from experiment to experiment, and that models that fail to take this heterogeneity into account can produce biased estimators. We present two new estimators and show with simulation studies that they perform better than conventional methods under realistic conditions. These estimators may be appropriate whenever PCR data from several experiments are combined.