跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论总体类别数量与抽样理论,没有给定经济计量领域细分所需的具体研究对象。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
J. Bunge
M. Fitzpatrick

物种数量估计:综述

研究问题
面对大量可能尚未被观测到的稀有类别,如何估计总体类别总数,并理解不同抽样模型下估计方法的局限?
方法与思路
作者按抽样模型、有限或无限总体以及估计理念整理文献,比较参数与非参数、频率学派与贝叶斯路径。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要指出不存在普遍更优的类别数估计量,并提出利用样本覆盖率、重抽样及抽样过程表示推进研究的方向。
阅读关注点
应核对各类抽样机制下类别数的可识别程度、未观测小类别造成的困难,以及覆盖率信息如何支持改进估计。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;不能推断刊本变化。这是综述,摘要中的文献判断有其时间范围,不能当作当前完整共识。

原文摘要

How many kinds are there? Suppose that a population is partitioned into C classes. In many situations interest focuses not on estimation of the relative sizes of the classes, but on estimation of C itself. For example, biologists and ecologists may be interested in estimating the number of species in a population of plants or animals, numismatists may be concemed with estimating the number of dies used to produce an ancient coin issue, and linguists may be interested in estimating the size of an author's vocabulary. In this article we review the problem of statistical estimation of C. Many approaches have been proposed, some purely data-analytic and others based in sampling theory. In the latter case numerous variations have been considered. The population may be finite or infinite. If finite, samples may be taken with replacement (multinomial sampling) or without replacement (hypergeometric sampling), or by Bernoulli sampling; if infinite, sampling may be multinomial or Bernoulli, or the sample may be the result of random Poisson contributions of each dass. Given a sampling model, one may approach estimation of C via a parametric or nonparametric formulation; in either case there may be frequentist and Bayesian procedures. We begin by discussing the existing literature on this problem (over 120 references), organizing it by sampling model, population specification, and philosophy of estimation. We find that (a) the problem is quite resistant to statistical solution, essentially because no matter how many classes have been observed, there may still be a large number of very small unobserved classes; (b) many closely related estimation procedures have been developed independently and have not yet been compared; (c) there is not as yet a globally preferable estimator of C, although for some models there is an acceptable estimator (for some not even this is true); and (d) there are promising directions for research to pursue; for example, it appears possible to exploit estimates of the “coverage” of the sample (the total proportion of the population represented by the observed classes) to improve the accuracy of estimators of the number of classes. Finally, we make specific recommendations for future research, regarding parametric estimation, coverage-based estimation, resampling methods, Poisson process representation of sampling models, and frequentist decision theory.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文