跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要以高频金融收益构造已实现跳跃变差,并检验这些指标对未来已实现波动率的预测内容。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Diep Duong
Norman R. Swanson

聚合、非对称性与跳跃对波动率预测重要性的实证证据

研究问题
高频收益构造的跳跃幂变差、大小跳跃和上下行非对称指标,能为未来已实现波动率预测增加多少有效信息?
方法与思路
作者使用标普500期货和道琼斯30只股票的高频收益,构造多种跳跃变差指标,并估计线性与非线性HAR-RV类模型。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称小跳跃比大跳跃更有预测帮助,带符号及下行跳跃具有预测信息;加入上下行跳跃指标的预测改善程度有限。
阅读关注点
应核对跳跃识别阈值、幂次与聚合方式、预测期限和样本外评价,并区分与未来波动率相关和实际预测误差改善。
阅读边界
仅据所给出版社摘要,无法判断改善的数值、统计显著性与稳健范围;特定资产样本中的发现不能推广为普遍预测规律。

原文摘要

Many recent modeling advances in finance topics ranging from the pricing of volatility-based derivative products to asset management are predicated on the importance of jumps, or discontinuous movements in asset returns. In light of this, a number of recent papers have addressed volatility predictability, some from the perspective of the usefulness of jumps in forecasting volatility. Key papers in this area include Andersen et al. (2003), Corsi (2004), Andersen et al. (2007), Corsi et al. (2008), Barndorff et al. (2010), Patton and Shephard (2011), and the references cited therein. In this paper, we review the extant literature and then present new empirical evidence on the predictive content of realized measures of jump power variations (including upside and downside risk, jump asymmetry, and truncated jump variables), constructed using instantaneous returns, i.e., |rt|q,0≤q≤6 in the spirit of Ding et al. (1993) and Ding and Granger (1996). We also present new empirical evidence on the predictive content of realized measures of truncated large jump variations, constructed using truncated squared instantaneous return, i.e., rt2×I|rt|>γ, where γ is the threshold jump size. Our prediction experiments use high frequency price returns constructed using S&P500 futures data as well as stocks in the Dow 30, and our empirical implementation involves estimating linear and nonlinear heterogeneous autoregressive realized volatility (HAR-RV) type models. We find that past “large” jump power variations help less in the prediction of future realized volatility, than past “small” jump power variations. Additionally, we find evidence that past realized signed jump power variations, which have not previously been examined in this literature, are strongly correlated with future volatility, and that past downside jump variations matter in prediction. Finally, incorporation of downside and upside jump power variations does improve predictability, albeit to a limited extent.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文