跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究 Probit 模型的极大似然估计、协方差估计与有限样本检验,对应离散选择方法。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
R. Carter Hill
Peter J. Pope

Probit 模型估计量的小样本性质

研究问题
Probit 极大似然估计中渐近等价的三种协方差估计,在有限样本和不同共线程度下表现如何,预检验又怎样影响分布?
方法与思路
作者用蒙特卡洛实验比较 Hessian、信息矩阵和得分外积对应的协方差估计,并考察检验统计量及变量遗漏预检验估计量。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,前两者更贴近渐近协方差,得分外积更贴近有限样本均方误差;预检验估计量的分布则很少能由正态近似良好描述。
阅读关注点
应核对模拟样本量、共线性设定、协方差与均方误差的比较目标,以及标准误差选择对实际检验表现的影响。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;所述结论来自特定模拟,不能据此指定普遍最优的标准误差方法,也不能推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

When maximum likelihood estimates of the coefficients in a nonlinear model such as the probit model are obtained there are a number of asymptotically equivalent covariance matrix estimators that can be used. These covariance matrix estimators are typically associated with different computer algorithms. For example, with the Newton–Raphson algorithm the inverse of the negative of the Hessian matrix from the log-likelihood function is used; with the method of scoring the inverse of the information matrix is used; and with a procedure proposed by Berndt, Hall, Hall, and Hausman (1974), the inverse of the outer product of the first derivatives of the log-likelihood function is used. Although these three estimators are asymptotically equivalent, their performance can vary in finite samples. The main objective of this article is to use a Monte Carlo experiment to investigate the finite sample properties of the three covariance matrix estimators, in the context of maximum likelihood estimation of the probit model. Related questions concerning the empirical distributions of test statistics and the properties of a preliminary test estimator are also examined, under varying degrees of multicollinearity. We find that, on average, the Hessian matrix and the information matrix give almost identical results and lead to more accurate estimates of the asymptotic covariance matrix than does the estimator based on first derivatives. The finite sample mean squared error of the maximum likelihood estimator, however, is considerably greater than the asymptotic covariance matrix, and the estimator based on first derivatives provides a better estimate of finite sample mean squared error. All three estimators lead to empirical distributions that can be approximated by an asymptotic normal distribution. The pretest estimator formed by testing for the omission of an explanatory variable is reasonably efficient, but its distribution is seldom well approximated by a normal distribution.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文