跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究社会网络上的滚雪球和受访者驱动抽样,以及网络依赖引起的方差变化。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Karl Rohe

网络抽样设计效应的临界阈值

研究问题
网络转介抽样中,转介率和网络聚类如何决定估计方差随样本量的增长,以及常规根号样本量一致性何时失效?
方法与思路
作者把转介抽样建模为树索引马尔可夫过程,用转介率与转移矩阵第二特征值分析设计效应,并提出适应不确定性的重抽样法。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,设计效应存在临界阈值,阈值两侧对应不同收敛速度;文章还通过计算研究无放回抽样,并比较重抽样方法。
阅读关注点
应核对转介树假设、特征值与阈值的定义、阈值等号情形、标准误收敛结论,以及新重抽样方法的置信区间表现。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的索引摘要;转介树条件和阈值等号情形未说明,无放回抽样结论由计算支持,不能视作一般理论证明。

原文摘要

Web crawling, snowball sampling, and respondent-driven sampling (RDS) are three types of network sampling techniques used to contact individuals in hard-to-reach populations. This paper studies these procedures as a Markov process on the social network that is indexed by a tree. Each node in this tree corresponds to an observation and each edge in the tree corresponds to a referral. Indexing with a tree (instead of a chain) allows for the sampled units to refer multiple future units into the sample. In survey sampling, the design effect characterizes the additional variance induced by a novel sampling strategy. If the design effect is some value $\operatorname{DE}$, then constructing an estimator from the novel design makes the variance of the estimator $\operatorname{DE}$ times greater than it would be under a simple random sample with the same sample size $n$. Under certain assumptions on the referral tree, the design effect of network sampling has a critical threshold that is a function of the referral rate $m$ and the clustering structure in the social network, represented by the second eigenvalue of the Markov transition matrix, $\lambda_{2}$. If $m<1/\lambda_{2}^{2}$, then the design effect is finite (i.e., the standard estimator is $\sqrt{n}$-consistent). However, if $m>1/\lambda_{2}^{2}$, then the design effect grows with $n$ (i.e., the standard estimator is no longer $\sqrt{n}$-consistent). Past this critical threshold, the standard error of the estimator converges at the slower rate of $n^{\log_{m}\lambda_{2}}$. The Markov model allows for nodes to be resampled; computational results show that the findings hold in without-replacement sampling. To estimate confidence intervals that adapt to the correct level of uncertainty, a novel resampling procedure is proposed. Computational experiments compare this procedure to previous techniques.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文