The Beveridge–Nelson decomposition in retrospect and prospect
贝弗里奇—纳尔逊分解的回顾与展望AI 解读 ↓
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明
本页整理公开书目信息，不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成，未完成全文核验，可能有误；具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本，未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要；缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录，不合计多个记录；关联记录可能包含正式发表版本，不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零，引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配，同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列，再参考通用方法与发表日期。
分类依据与纠错
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类：摘要围绕宏观时间序列的随机趋势与周期分解展开，并明确用未来增长预测能力比较周期指标，对应这两个方向。
反馈分类问题
正在核对关联版本…
代码、数据与补充材料
正在核对对应版本的资源…
关注这篇论文的作者
贝弗里奇—纳尔逊分解的回顾与展望
- 研究问题
- 以长期预测定义随机趋势的贝弗里奇—纳尔逊分解如何理解经济周期，其他周期指标能否提供超出其短期动量的增长预测信息？
- 方法与思路
- 作者回顾以长期预测衡量趋势的分解思路及一阶差分平稳下的成分性质，并从预测未来增长的能力比较不同周期测度。
- 材料陈述的贡献
- 摘要称该分解将较多产出变化归于趋势冲击；所呈结果提示，其他周期测度几乎没有提供超出其捕捉的短期动量的信息。
- 阅读关注点
- 应核对长期预测与随机趋势的关系、周期指标的构造，以及增长预测比较是否使用一致的信息集、预测期限和评价设计。
- 阅读边界
- 仅据所给出版社摘要，不能判定所有周期指标均无额外信息；摘要未说明比较样本、预测模型、检验方式和具体结果。
原文摘要
Beveridge and Nelson [Beveridge, Stephen, Nelson, Charles R., 1981. A new approach to decomposition of economic time series into permanent and transitory components with particular attention to measurement of the 'business cycle'. Journal of Monetary Economics 7, 151-174] proposed that the long-run forecast is a measure of trend for time series such as GDP that do not follow a deterministic path in the long run. They showed that if the series is stationary in first differences, then the estimated trend is a random walk with drift that accounts for growth, and the cycle is stationary. In contrast to linear de-trending, the smoother of Hodrick and Prescott (1981) and Hodrick and Prescott [Hodrick, Robert, Prescott, Edward C., 1997. Post-war US business cycles: An empirical investigation. Journal of Money Credit and Banking 29 (1), 1-16] and the unobserved components model of Harvey, [Harvey, A.C., 1985. Trends and cycles in macroeconomic time series. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 3, 216-227]. Watson [Watson, Mark W., 1986. Univariate detrending methods with stochastic trends Journal of Monetary Economics 18, 49-75] and Clark [Clark, Peter K., 1987. The cyclical component of US economic activity. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 102 (4), 797-814], the BN decomposition attributes most variation in GDP to trend shocks while the cycles are short and brief. Since each is an estimate of the transitory part of GDP that will die out, it seems natural to compare cycle measures by their ability to forecast future growth. The results presented here suggest that cycle measures contain little if any information beyond the short-term momentum captured by BN.