跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接讨论观测数据中的多重因果效应建模、评价与干预分配。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Juhua Chen
Karson shi
Jialing He
North Chen
Kele Jiang

MMCE:多重因果效应的深度单调建模框架

研究问题
在仅有观测数据、需要同时估计多种激励效应的场景中,如何建立个体价格响应曲线,并评价其对资源分配的用途?
方法与思路
作者提出同时建模多个因果效应的观测数据框架,并讨论基于三个先验的定性评价及观测数据成为评价集的条件。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,该框架在部分异常分布下提高建模准确性,离线分析与在线实验支持其分配策略效果;未提供具体数值。
阅读关注点
应核对深度单调模型的结构、多种效应的定义、观测数据识别条件,以及评价集条件与在线实验的设计是否充分。
阅读边界
这是 arXiv 预印本,不能据此确认同行评审或期刊接收。摘要未说明识别假设,首创性与显著改善的宣称尚无法核验。

原文摘要

When we plan to use money as an incentive to change the behavior of a person (such as making riders to deliver more orders or making consumers to buy more items), the common approach of this problem is to adopt a two-stage framework in order to maximize ROI under cost constraints. In the first stage, the individual price response curve is obtained. In the second stage, business goals and resource constraints are formally expressed and modeled as an optimization problem. The first stage is very critical. It can answer a very important question. This question is how much incremental results can incentives bring, which is the basis of the second stage. Usually, the causal modeling is used to obtain the curve. In the case of only observational data, causal modeling and evaluation are very challenging. In some business scenarios, multiple causal effects need to be obtained at the same time. This paper proposes a new observational data modeling and evaluation framework, which can simultaneously model multiple causal effects and greatly improve the modeling accuracy under some abnormal distributions. In the absence of RCT data, evaluation seems impossible. This paper summarizes three priors to illustrate the necessity and feasibility of qualitative evaluation of cognitive testing. At the same time, this paper innovatively proposes the conditions under which observational data can be considered as an evaluation dataset. Our approach is very groundbreaking. It is the first to propose a modeling framework that simultaneously obtains multiple causal effects. The offline analysis and online experimental results show the effectiveness of the results and significantly improve the effectiveness of the allocation strategies generated in real world marketing activities.

笔记与分组