An Ancillarity Paradox Which Appears in Multiple Linear Regression
多元线性回归中的辅助统计量悖论AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论回归估计的决策理论与辅助统计量,未提供所列经济计量细分方向的充分依据。
反馈分类问题多元线性回归中的辅助统计量悖论AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Consider a multiple linear regression in which $Y_i, i = 1, \cdots, n$, are independent normal variables with variance $\sigma^2$ and $E(Y_i) = \alpha + V'_i\beta$, where $V_i \in \mathbb{R}^r$ and $\beta \in \mathbb{R}^r.$ Let $\hat{\alpha}$ denote the usual least squares estimator of $\alpha$. Suppose that $V_i$ are themselves observations of independent multivariate normal random variables with mean 0 and known, nonsingular covariance matrix $\theta$. Then $\hat{\alpha}$ is admissible under squared error loss if $r \geq 2$. Several estimators dominating $\hat{\alpha}$ when $r \geq 3$ are presented. Analogous results are presented for the case where $\sigma^2$ or $\theta$ are unknown and some other generalizations are also considered. It is noted that some of these results for $r \geq 3$ appear in earlier papers of Baranchik and of Takada. $\{V_i\}$ are ancillary statistics in the above setting. Hence admissibility of $\hat{\alpha}$ depends on the distribution of the ancillary statistics, since if $\{V_i\}$ is fixed instead of random, then $\hat{\alpha}$ is admissible. This fact contradicts a widely held notion about ancillary statistics; some interpretations and consequences of this paradox are briefly discussed.