跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用椭圆分布的估计与检验,没有指定经济应用或相应细分依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Yutaka Kano
Maia Berkane
Peter M. Bentler

椭圆总体中基于伪最大似然估计的统计推断

研究问题
当总体属于椭圆分布但密度未知、所选分布族可能误设时,如何构造有效的参数估计与经过校正的检验?
方法与思路
作者在选定椭圆分布族下使用似然,将额外参数替换为低成本估计,并研究误设下的估计性质与检验校正。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,证明了估计的一致性和渐近正态性,以及校正后似然比、Wald 和得分检验的渐近等价性与卡方性质。
阅读关注点
应核对误设下估计所针对的参数、常数校正的形式、额外参数估计的条件,以及分布族选择准则的依据。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;具体正则条件与效率比较未提供,不能据此认为任意椭圆分布误设都可被校正。

原文摘要

In this article we develop statistical inference based on the maximum likelihood method in elliptical populations with an unknown density function. The method assuming the multivariate normal distribution, using the sample mean and the sample covariance matrix, is basically correct even for elliptical populations under a certain kurtosis adjustment, but is not statistically efficient, especially when the kurtosis of the population distribution has higher than moderate values. On the other hand, several methods of statistical inference assuming a particular family (e.g., multivariate T distribution) of elliptical distributions have been recommended as a robust procedure against outliers or distributions with heavy tails. Such inference also will be important to maintain a high efficiency of statistical inference in elliptical populations. In practice, however, it is very difficult to choose an appropriate family of elliptical distributions, and one may misspecify the family. Furthermore, extra parameters (i.e., other than means and covariances) may make computation heavy. Here we investigate the maximum likelihood method assuming a particular family of elliptical distributions with extra parameters replaced by inexpensive estimators when the assumed family may be misspecified. Consistency and asymptotic normality of the estimators are proved, and the asymptotic equivalence among the likelihood ratio, Wald and Score test statistics, and their chi-squaredness under a constant correction are shown. Two easy methods of estimating extra parameters are proposed. A criterion for choosing a family among competing elliptical families is also provided.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文