A Two-Part Framework for Estimating Individualized Treatment Rules From Semicontinuous Outcomes
从半连续结局估计个体化处理规则的两部分框架AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究根据患者特征选择处理的个体化规则,并用于卫生干预;零值与正值建模本身不足以另加分布效应分类。
从半连续结局估计个体化处理规则的两部分框架AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Jared D. Hulinga , Maureen A. Smithb & Guanhua Chenc* a Division of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; b Departments of Population Health Sciences and Family Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI; c Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WISupplementary materials for this article are available online. Please go to www.tandfonline.com/r/JASA.CONTACT Jared Huling huling@umn.edu Division of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455; Guanhua Chen gchen25@wisc.edu Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53792.AbstractHealth care payments are an important component of health care utilization and are thus a major focus in health services and health policy applications. However, payment outcomes are semicontinuous in that over a given period of time some patients incur no payments and some patients incur large costs. Individualized treatment rules (ITRs) are a major part of the push for tailoring treatments and interventions to patients, yet there is a little work focused on estimating ITRs from semicontinuous outcomes. In this article, we develop a framework for estimation of ITRs based on two-part modeling, wherein the ITR is estimated by separately targeting the zero part of the outcome and the strictly positive part. To improve performance when high-dimensional covariates are available, we leverage a scientifically plausible penalty that simultaneously selects variables and encourages the signs of coefficients for each variable to agree between the two components of the ITR. We develop an efficient algorithm for computation and prove oracle inequalities for the resulting estimation and prediction errors. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in simulated examples and in a study of a health system intervention. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
当处理发生溢出:时空因果效应估计的神经网络框架
Real-world public health policies are often enacted by local jurisdictions, but their effects can ripple through connected populations. For causal evaluation, this creates a difficult spatiotemporal problem: intermittent policy updates create path-level treatments, and because spillover depends on neighboring treatment paths along with the focal-unit's own history, controlling time-varying confounding requires high-dimensional, multimodal information from both sources. To…
组间不平衡下的风险异质性稳健推断
Population-level heterogeneity is ubiquitous in biomedical data, where differences across demographic or clinical subgroups can substantially alter risk patterns. For example, in intensive care unit (ICU) studies, the mortality risk associated with specific admission diagnoses can vary across ethnic groups. Existing approaches for detecting risk heterogeneity are often sensitive to baseline model misspecification and regularization bias, both of which commonly arise in…
Bayesian additive regression trees (BART) is a popular Bayesian ensemble model used in regression and classification analysis. Under this modeling framework, the regression function is approximated by an ensemble of decision trees, interpreted as weak learners. In this work, we propose a generalization of the BART model that has two main features: first, it automatically selects the number of decision trees using the given data; second, the model allows clusters of…
The conditional average treatment effect (CATE) is frequently estimated in clinical studies to refute a homogeneous treatment effect hypothesis. Under this regime, all patients making up the population experience identical benefit from a given treatment relative to a comparator. Uncovering heterogeneous treatment effects through inference about the CATE, however, requires that covariates truly modifying the treatment effect be reliably collected at baseline. CATE-based…
TMLE 与 AIPW 中样本分割选择何时重要:交叉拟合、目标化与重复
Variants of targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) and augmented inverse-probability weighting (AIPW) with machine-learning nuisance models differ in which observations train them, how bias is corrected, and whether splits are repeated. In known-truth simulations of a binary-outcome average treatment effect, eight headline estimators shared each setting's library, inner folds and truncation bound; coverage differences were judged against a prespecified…
IV-LASSO 的工具变量字典与惩罚选择
Estimating the first stage of an instrumental variables (IV) model with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) requires choosing a dictionary of technical instruments and a penalty level. First-order asymptotic theory offers no guidance on these choices, as any consistent implementation yields a structural parameter estimator with the same limiting distribution. In finite samples, however, these choices can have a substantial impact on the resulting…