跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要以静态联立方程模型的内生与外生变量参数为对象,讨论工具变量及k类估计的偏差修正,与结构方程估计直接相关。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Emma M. Iglesias

强或弱工具变量下联立方程模型的近乎无偏估计

研究问题
在强或弱工具变量下,如何降低静态联立方程模型中内生及外生变量系数的估计偏差,同时保证估计量高阶矩的存在?
方法与思路
作者提出两种偏差缩减程序,其中第二种对k<1的k类估计量作线性组合;在较弱误差分布条件下推导性质,并用两方程模型模拟和应用比较。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,两法在相应条件下近乎无偏且具有高阶矩;组合k类估计在过度识别程度为0、1或至少8时,理论均方误差小于2SLS。
阅读关注点
全文应核对两种修正的具体公式、无偏阶数的定义、k值选择与矩存在条件,并检查均方误差比较对工具强度及过度识别程度的依赖。
阅读边界
摘要未说明弱工具变量的具体渐近设定、误差分布条件和实证应用细节;均方误差优势仅对应所述条件,不能概括为普遍优于2SLS。

原文摘要

We propose two simple bias-reduction procedures that apply to estimators in a general static simultaneous equation model and that are valid under relatively weak distributional assumptions for the errors. Standard jackknife estimators, as applied to 2SLS, may not reduce the bias of the exogenous variable coefficient estimators since the estimator biases are not monotonically nonincreasing with sample size (a necessary condition for successful bias reduction) and they have moments only up to the order of overidentification. Our proposed approaches do not have either of these drawbacks. (1) In the first procedure, both endogenous and exogenous variable parameter estimators are unbiased to order T − 2 and when implemented for k-class estimators for which k < 1, the higher-order moments will exist. (2) An alternative second approach is based on taking linear combinations of k-class estimators for k < 1. In general, this yields estimators that are unbiased to order T − 1 and that possess higher moments. We also prove theoretically how the combined k-class estimator produces a smaller mean squared error than 2SLS when the degree of overidentification of the system is 0, 1, or at least 8. The performance of the two procedures is compared with 2SLS in a number of Monte Carlo experiments using a simple two-equation model. Finally, an application shows the usefulness of our new estimator in practice versus competitor estimators.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文