跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦分类器迁移下的总体类别比例估计,未研究所列分布效应、离散选择或宏观金融预测问题。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Jacob Fiksel
Abhirup Datta
Agbessi Amouzou
Scott Zeger

数据集偏移下的广义贝叶斯类别比例学习

研究问题
当训练与目标总体存在数据集偏移,分类器误分类率无法直接迁移,且少量目标标签也不确定时,如何估计目标类别比例?
方法与思路
作者利用概率分类器的完整组成预测,以一阶矩假设和 KL 损失构造广义贝叶斯估计方程,并讨论多分类器集成及 Gibbs 抽样。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,方法涵盖已有比例估计方法,建立后验一致性、渐近正态性、区间覆盖及有限样本后验集中结果,并提供模拟与应用。
阅读关注点
应核对一阶矩约束如何连接预测与真实类别比例、标签不确定性的处理、后验覆盖条件,以及损失近似对计算的影响。
阅读边界
依据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;一阶矩假设、区间校准条件及有限样本界的具体形式未提供,不能理解为对任意数据偏移有效。

原文摘要

Quantification learning is the task of prevalence estimation for a test population using predictions from a classifier trained on a different population. Quantification methods assume that the sensitivities and specificities of the classifier are either perfect or transportable from the training to the test population. These assumptions are inappropriate in the presence of dataset shift, when the misclassification rates in the training population are not representative of those for the test population. Quantification under dataset shift has been addressed only for single-class (categorical) predictions and assuming perfect knowledge of the true labels on a small subset of the test population. We propose generalized Bayes quantification learning (GBQL) that uses the entire compositional predictions from probabilistic classifiers and allows for uncertainty in true class labels for the limited labeled test data. Instead of positing a full model, we use a model-free Bayesian estimating equation approach to compositional data using Kullback–Leibler loss-functions based only on a first-moment assumption. The idea will be useful in Bayesian compositional data analysis in general as it is robust to different generating mechanisms for compositional data and allows 0’s and 1’s in the compositional outputs thereby including categorical outputs as a special case. We show how our method yields existing quantification approaches as special cases. Extension to an ensemble GBQL that uses predictions from multiple classifiers yielding inference robust to inclusion of a poor classifier is discussed. We outline a fast and efficient Gibbs sampler using a rounding and coarsening approximation to the loss functions. We establish posterior consistency, asymptotic normality and valid coverage of interval estimates from GBQL, which to our knowledge are the first theoretical results for a quantification approach in the presence of local labeled data. We also establish finite sample posterior concentration rate. Empirical performance of GBQL is demonstrated through simulations and analysis of real data with evident dataset shift. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文