Nearest-Neighbor Variance Estimation (NNVE)
最近邻方差估计(NNVE)AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究一般稳健协方差估计与异常点处理,未明确涉及金融波动率、风险或其他所列细分领域。
最近邻方差估计(NNVE)AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Robust covariance estimation commonly proceeds by downweighting outliers. In this article we measure the “outlyingness” of a data point by the standardized distance between the point and its Kth nearest neighbor. The appropriate weights for robust estimation are found by a model-based mixture modeling approach that follows from considering the data cloud as a realization of a high-dimensional point process. To correct a potential bias when there are no outliers, we introduce a boundary correction procedure that artificially adds in extra outlying points; the resulting methodology is called nearest-neighbor variance estimation (NNVE). The strength of NNVE is its robustness against a large proportion of noise points and against deviation from normality of the signal. A consistency result for the method is established. Under some reasonable assumptions, it is shown that the covariance estimate is bounded and that each point has only bounded influence on the final estimates. NNVE outperformed the popular minimum volume ellipsoid (MVE) estimator in simulation studies, with a big improvement when the proportion of outliers was very large (> 50%). In our simulation study, when the proportion of outliers was ≥ 50%, the mean squared error of the NNVE estimator of variance was at least 100 times smaller than that of the MVE estimator. The proposed estimator also outperformed MVE in cases where the underlying data distribution was not normal. Good performance of NNVE in several real examples is demonstrated. A potential drawback of NNVE is that data points condensed in moderate-sized clusters would be classified as signal. Even though we do not support approaches discarding moderate-sized clusters as outliers without checking, this feature of NNVE could be problematic, particularly when only the main data cloud is of interest. A simple diagnostic tool built on existing model-based clustering procedure is proposed. This procedure allows us to check whether there is more than one separate data cloud in the data after cleaning. It also supplies the central locations of the separated moderate-sized clusters, which allows further investigation. Finally, because NNVE reduces the problem of finding the robustness weights to a one-dimensional problem, it may be useful in high-dimensional problems, such as those encountered in data mining.