跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究时间序列预测回归中的平稳与近单位根问题,并以美国季度股票收益检验说明应用。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Jörg Breitung
Matei Demetrescu

预测回归中基于工具变量与变量增补的推断

研究问题
预测变量可能平稳、近单位根或单位根,且波动率随时间变化时,如何进行零假设极限分布不随持久性改变的检验?
方法与思路
作者改进变量增补方法,并构造工具变量推断程序;通过高层条件处理不同持久性和时变波动率,配合模拟及美国股票收益应用。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称两类检验具有标准极限分布,变量增补改善渐近功效,工具变量方法可进一步提高局部功效并达到所述最优速率。
阅读关注点
应核对工具变量与增补项的构造、高层条件的可检验含义,以及不同持久性下尺寸控制和局部功效比较的具体设置。
阅读边界
仅据所给出版社摘要,无法判断所有持久性情形下的有限样本可靠性;局部备择速率的原文记号及完整条件需要正文核实。

原文摘要

Valid inference in predictive regressions depends in a crucial manner on the degree of persistence of the predictor variables. The paper studies test procedures that are robust in the sense that their asymptotic null distributions are invariant to the persistence of the predictor, that is, the limiting distribution is the same irrespective of whether the regressors are stationary or (nearly) integrated. Existing procedures are often conservative (e.g. tests based on Bonferroni bounds), are based on highly restrictive assumptions (such as homoskedasticity or assuming an AR(1) process for the regressor) or fail to have power against alternatives in a 1T neighborhood of the null hypothesis. We first propose a refinement of the variable addition method with improved asymptotic power approaching the optimal rate. Second, inference based on instrumental variables may further improve the (local) power of the test and even achieve local power under the optimal 1T rate. We give high-level conditions under which the suggested variable addition and instrumental variable procedures are valid no matter whether the predictor is stationary, near-integrated or integrated, or exhibits time-varying volatility. All test statistics possess a standard limiting distribution. Monte Carlo experiments suggest that tests based on simple combinations of instruments perform most promising relative to existing tests. An application to quarterly US stock returns illustrates the need for robust inference.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文