Instrumental variable and variable addition based inference in predictive regressions
预测回归中基于工具变量与变量增补的推断AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究时间序列预测回归中的平稳与近单位根问题,并以美国季度股票收益检验说明应用。
预测回归中基于工具变量与变量增补的推断AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Valid inference in predictive regressions depends in a crucial manner on the degree of persistence of the predictor variables. The paper studies test procedures that are robust in the sense that their asymptotic null distributions are invariant to the persistence of the predictor, that is, the limiting distribution is the same irrespective of whether the regressors are stationary or (nearly) integrated. Existing procedures are often conservative (e.g. tests based on Bonferroni bounds), are based on highly restrictive assumptions (such as homoskedasticity or assuming an AR(1) process for the regressor) or fail to have power against alternatives in a 1T neighborhood of the null hypothesis. We first propose a refinement of the variable addition method with improved asymptotic power approaching the optimal rate. Second, inference based on instrumental variables may further improve the (local) power of the test and even achieve local power under the optimal 1T rate. We give high-level conditions under which the suggested variable addition and instrumental variable procedures are valid no matter whether the predictor is stationary, near-integrated or integrated, or exhibits time-varying volatility. All test statistics possess a standard limiting distribution. Monte Carlo experiments suggest that tests based on simple combinations of instruments perform most promising relative to existing tests. An application to quarterly US stock returns illustrates the need for robust inference.