Understanding Spatial Regression Models from a Weighting Perspective in an Observational Study of Superfund Remediation
从加权视角理解空间回归：超级基金场地修复的观察性研究AI 解读 ↓
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明
本页整理公开书目信息，不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成，未完成全文核验，可能有误；具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本，未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要；缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本；arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历，都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对，只展示已核实例，档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录，不合计多个记录；关联记录可能包含正式发表版本，不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零，引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配，同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列，再参考通用方法与发表日期。
分类依据与纠错
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类：摘要明确用加权因果框架处理观察性研究中的未测量空间混杂。
反馈分类问题
正在核对关联版本…
代码、数据与补充材料
正在核对对应版本的资源…
从加权视角理解空间回归：超级基金场地修复的观察性研究
- 研究问题
- 空间回归在有限样本中究竟调整了哪些未观测空间混杂，能否将其改写为加权因果比较，并用于评估污染场地修复对出生结果的影响？
- 方法与思路
- 作者以加权框架统一空间随机效应、条件自回归和高斯过程模型，解释隐含协变量平衡，并提出联合处理多种空间混杂的估计量及诊断。
- 材料陈述的贡献
- 摘要称，空间误差诱导潜在协变量的近似平衡，协方差结构可等价表示为回归变量；新估计量发现修复具有较小的有益影响。
- 阅读关注点
- 应核对潜在协变量的构造、近似平衡所控制的混杂类型，以及协方差设定和诊断图如何支持应用中的因果解释与稳健性。
- 阅读边界
- 这是 arXiv 预印本，不能据此确认同行评审或接收。摘要未给出效应数值及完整识别条件，空间误差建模不能据此视为消除所有混杂。
原文摘要
A key challenge in environmental health research is unmeasured spatial confounding, driven by unobserved spatially structured variables that influence both treatment and outcome. A common approach is to fit a spatial regression that models the outcome as a linear function of treatment and covariates, with a spatially structured error term to account for unmeasured spatial confounding. However, it remains unclear to what extent spatial regression actually accounts for such forms of confounding in finite samples, and whether this regression adjustment can be reformulated from a design-based perspective. Motivated by an observational study on the effect of Superfund site remediation on birth outcomes, we present a weighting framework for causal inference that unifies three canonical classes of spatial regression models$\unicode{x2013}$random effects, conditional autoregressive, and Gaussian process models$\unicode{x2013}$and reveals how they implicitly construct causal contrasts across space. Specifically, we show that: (i) the spatial error term induces approximate balance on a latent set of covariates and therefore adjusts for a specific form of unmeasured confounding; and (ii) the covariance structure of the spatial error can be equivalently represented as regressors in a linear model. Building on these insights, we introduce a new estimator that jointly addresses multiple forms of unmeasured spatial confounding and develop visual diagnostics. Using our new estimator, we find evidence of a small but beneficial effect of remediation on the percentage of small vulnerable newborns.