跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要涉及遗传测量误差、混合分布与法医证据,未明确对应所列经济或金融领域,不凭混合模型字样归入结构估计。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
B. Devlin
Neil Risch
Kathryn Roeder

基于 DNA 指纹的法医推断

研究问题
当 DNA 片段尺寸带有显著测量误差、真实等位基因不可直接观测时,如何量化样本匹配所提供的法医证据?
方法与思路
作者先估计由离散等位基因与测量误差形成的混合分布,再比较同一人与不同人来源的似然,并用贝叶斯风险评价位点。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,文章提出汇总 DNA 指纹证据的统计方法,并以两个位点数据说明应用,认为指纹可提供有力的法医信息。
阅读关注点
应核对测量误差模型、混合分布估计、同人与异人假设的似然构造,以及位点信息量评价所需的设定。
阅读边界
摘要未给出误差模型、匹配准确率或适用人群条件,不能将似然比较直接解释为有罪概率;索引版本及刊本变化未知。

原文摘要

The recent discovery of hypervariable regions of the human genome provides scientists with an important new tool for forensic inference. The DNA data obtained from these hypervariable regions have been dubbed DNA fingerprints. Despite the potential power of DNA fingerprints, their use has been fraught with controversy, deriving in part from a lack of statistical methods to summarize the information contained in a DNA fingerprint. This article provides such a method, useful for forensic inference in criminal (e.g., murder or rape) and civil cases (e.g., paternity). The major difficulty with DNA fingerprint data is that the alleles (distinct DNA fragment sizes) are not observed; rather, one observes measurements of the DNA fragments with substantial error. When measurement error is superimposed on the discrete allele distribution, the fragments follow a mixture distribution. Consequently, our first step for forensic inference was to estimate the mixing distribution. With an estimate of the allele distribution, we summarize the information contained in a particular DNA fingerprint as the likelihood that the suspect and evidentiary samples are from the same individual versus the likelihood that they are from two different individuals. The informativeness of DNA fingerprint loci can be determined using Bayes risk methods. The methods we suggest are illustrated with a data set of DNA fragments from two hypervariable regions of the human genome (two loci, D2S44 and D17S79). Our results indicate that DNA fingerprinting can indeed by a very powerful tool for forensic inference.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文