跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论融合专家意见的通用综合指数构造,虽涉及主成分分析与经济应用,但不足以归入所列专门方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Rong Chen
Yuanyuan Ji
Guolin Jiang
Han Xiao
Ruoqing Xie
Pingfang Zhu

融合专家意见的综合指数构造

研究问题
如何在概括多个分项指标的综合指数中,同时利用数据的变异信息和专家重要性判断,并考虑专家信心与专业程度?
方法与思路
作者以线性组合构造指数,在目标函数中结合指数方差与偏离专家评分的加权平方惩罚,并用数据选择二者的平衡。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称该程序把多位专家的评分、信心及专业程度纳入权重选择,并研究理论性质,以模拟和科技发展指数应用作说明。
阅读关注点
核对专家评分、信心和专业程度如何进入惩罚权重,数据驱动的平衡规则如何实现,以及理论性质成立的具体条件。
阅读边界
摘要未说明具体理论结论、专家评分可比性的处理及应用数据细节,不能据此判断该方法在其他指数构造中的表现。

原文摘要

Composite index is a powerful and popularly used tool in providing an overall measure of a subject by summarizing a group of measurements (component indices) of different aspects of the subject. It is widely used in economics, finance, policy evaluation, performance ranking, and many other fields. Effective construction of a composite index has been studied extensively. The most widely used approach is to use a linear combination of the component indices, where the combination weights are determined by optimizing an objective function. To maximize the overall variation of the resulting composite index, the combination weights can be obtained through principal component analysis. In this article, we propose to incorporate expert opinions into the construction of the composite index. It is noted that expert opinion often provides useful information in assessing which of the component indices are more important for the overall measure of the subject. We consider the case that a group of experts have been consulted, each providing a set of importance scores for the component indices, along with a set of confidence scores which reflects the expert’s own confidence in his/her assessment. In addition, the constructor of the composite index can also provide an assessment of the expertise level of each expert. We use linear combinations to construct the composite index, where the combination weights are determined by maximizing the sum of resulting composite index variation and the negative weighted sum of squares of deviation between the combination weights used and the experts’ scores. A data-driven approach is used to find the optimal balance between the two sources of information. Theoretical properties of the procedure are investigated. Simulation examples and an economic application on constructing science and technology development index is carried out to illustrate the proposed method.

笔记与分组