Composite Index Construction with Expert Opinion
融合专家意见的综合指数构造AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论融合专家意见的通用综合指数构造,虽涉及主成分分析与经济应用,但不足以归入所列专门方向。
反馈分类问题融合专家意见的综合指数构造AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Composite index is a powerful and popularly used tool in providing an overall measure of a subject by summarizing a group of measurements (component indices) of different aspects of the subject. It is widely used in economics, finance, policy evaluation, performance ranking, and many other fields. Effective construction of a composite index has been studied extensively. The most widely used approach is to use a linear combination of the component indices, where the combination weights are determined by optimizing an objective function. To maximize the overall variation of the resulting composite index, the combination weights can be obtained through principal component analysis. In this article, we propose to incorporate expert opinions into the construction of the composite index. It is noted that expert opinion often provides useful information in assessing which of the component indices are more important for the overall measure of the subject. We consider the case that a group of experts have been consulted, each providing a set of importance scores for the component indices, along with a set of confidence scores which reflects the expert’s own confidence in his/her assessment. In addition, the constructor of the composite index can also provide an assessment of the expertise level of each expert. We use linear combinations to construct the composite index, where the combination weights are determined by maximizing the sum of resulting composite index variation and the negative weighted sum of squares of deviation between the combination weights used and the experts’ scores. A data-driven approach is used to find the optimal balance between the two sources of information. Theoretical properties of the procedure are investigated. Simulation examples and an economic application on constructing science and technology development index is carried out to illustrate the proposed method.
Factor models for longitudinal data, where policy adoption is unconfounded with respect to a low-dimensional set of latent factor loadings, have become increasingly popular for causal inference. Most existing approaches, however, rely on a causal finite-sample approach or computationally intensive methods, limiting their applicability and external validity. In this paper, we propose a novel method for panel causal inference within a super-population framework, based on…
平均处理效应局部化:合成控制中的投影方法
Many real-world policies and business interventions require assessing short-term effects to inform timely decisions, even though most causal inference methods focus on long-term average treatment effects. In this article, we introduce average treatment effect localization (ATEL), which captures localized, short-term policy impacts in panel data settings with a single treated unit and provides early indicators of policy impact. To accommodate both time-varying and nonlinear…
跨度之外共同冲击下的合成控制:诊断、暴露平衡与修正
Synthetic control relies on pre-treatment fit to balance the unobserved factors that drive untreated outcomes. The argument fails when an observed common shock, such as a commodity price, moves with the latent factors before treatment and departs from them afterwards and pre-treatment fit then says almost nothing about the synthetic unit's exposure to the shock. I derive a period-specific bound that links the post-treatment bias of any weighting estimator to pre-treatment…
存在干扰时合成控制的稳健回归方法
Synthetic control methods are widely used for policy evaluation, but most existing approaches rule out interference among units, compromising validity when such effects are present. We develop a framework that accommodates contaminated donor pools and unknown interference patterns through two stages: factor-model adjustment for unobserved confounding, followed by robust regression in which direct and interference effects appear as a sparse outlier component. We study two…
不可观测异质性的去偏机器学习:高维面板与测量误差模型
Developing robust inference for models with nonparametric Unobserved Heterogeneity (UH) is both important and challenging. We propose novel Debiased Machine Learning (DML) procedures for valid inference on functionals of UH, allowing for partial identification of multivariate target and high-dimensional nuisance parameters. Our main contribution is a full characterization of all relevant Neyman-orthogonal moments in models with nonparametric UH, where relevance means…
潜在结果变量因果效应的非参数识别与估计
How should researchers conduct causal inference when the outcome of interest is latent and measured imperfectly by multiple indicators? We develop a general nonparametric framework for identifying and estimating average treatment effects on latent outcomes in randomized experiments. We show that latent-outcome estimation faces a fundamental but overlooked noncomparability problem due to measurement-set dependence: adding, removing, or replacing measurement targets a…