跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论一般线性回归的同时置信带及区域约束,未明确涉及所列领域细分。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Max Halperin
Joan Gurian

自变量取值受限时线性回归的置信带

研究问题
当自变量被限制在预先指定的区间或区域内时,如何构造具有指定同时置信水平的经典双曲线型回归置信带?
方法与思路
作者分别处理关于样本自变量均值对称和不对称的区间,并将对称情形推广到多元回归中以该均值点为中心的椭球区域。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称建立了相应分布关系;直线回归的数值比较提示,所提置信带的平均宽度较等宽带小,实用区间内也可能优于梯形带。
阅读关注点
应核对对称与不对称区间的分布结果、椭球区域构造、同时覆盖保证,以及平均宽度比较采用的权重和区间范围。
阅读边界
仅有版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;平均宽度较小不等于每一点都更窄,数值比较也不能替代普遍优势证明。完整条件及刊本变化未提供。

原文摘要

Several writers have studied the problem of obtaining confidence bands for a straight line regression under the requirement that the bands be at a specified confidence level, (1 – α) say, for values of the independent variable restricted to a pre-specified closed interval. The bands studied by other writers have been either bands of equal width throughout the interval or trapezoidal bands. This paper studies confidence bands of the classical hyperbolic type under the restriction noted above. Relevant distribution results differ according to whether the pre-specified interval on the independent variable is symmetric or asymmetric about the mean of the independent variable values in the experiment. In the former case the problem under study, is shown to be equivalent to a problem studied by Halperin et al (JASA, Sept. 1967) for which distribution theory and tables are already available. The symmetrical case is generalized to obtain confidence bands in multiple linear regression at level (1 – α) for an ellipsoidal region on the independent variables centered at the point of means of the independent variable values used in the experiment.For straight line regression some numerical comparisons are made with bands of the other types mentioned above. These comparisons suggest that the bands proposed in this paper are uniformly superior to bands of equal width in the sense of having smaller average width; the proposed bands appear to be superior to trapezoidal bands in the same sense for intervals of practical interest, i.e. within or reasonably close to the range on the independent variables used in the experiment.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文