The distribution of Ridgeless least squares interpolators
无岭最小二乘插值估计量的分布AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要主题为高维线性回归中插值估计量的分布理论与风险刻画,属于统计理论方向,与所列因果推断、面板、时间序列、金融等应用领域细分无直接文本对应,故不选择。
无岭最小二乘插值估计量的分布AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
The Ridgeless minimum $\ell_2$-norm interpolator in overparametrized linear regression has attracted considerable attention in recent years in both machine learning and statistics communities. While it seems to defy conventional wisdom that overfitting leads to poor prediction, recent theoretical research on its $\ell_2$-type risks reveals that its norm minimizing property induces an `implicit regularization' that helps prediction in spite of interpolation. This paper takes a further step that aims at understanding its precise stochastic behavior as a statistical estimator. Specifically, we characterize the distribution of the Ridgeless interpolator in high dimensions, in terms of a Ridge estimator in an associated Gaussian sequence model with positive regularization, which provides a precise quantification of the prescribed implicit regularization in the most general distributional sense. Our distributional characterizations hold for general non-Gaussian random designs and extend uniformly to positively regularized Ridge estimators. As a direct application, we obtain a complete characterization for a general class of weighted $\ell_q$ risks of the Ridge(less) estimators that are previously only known for $q=2$ by random matrix methods. These weighted $\ell_q$ risks not only include the standard prediction and estimation errors, but also include the non-standard covariate shift settings. Our uniform characterizations further reveal a surprising feature of the commonly used generalized and $k$-fold cross-validation schemes: tuning the estimated $\ell_2$ prediction risk by these methods alone lead to simultaneous optimal $\ell_2$ in-sample, prediction and estimation risks, as well as the optimal length of debiased confidence intervals.