跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:这里的结构型建模指测量误差统计模型,摘要没有经济行为结构估计或因果识别的直接证据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Donald A. Pierce
Daniel O. Stram
Michael Vaeth
Daniel W. Schafer

测量误差问题:原子弹幸存者辐射剂量反应分析的启示

研究问题
当真实辐射剂量分布高度非正态、观测剂量含乘性误差时,如何建立广义线性响应模型并处理协变量测量误差?
方法与思路
作者比较结构型与函数型测量误差建模,提出准结构型思路;在响应均值对真实协变量线性的情形下,讨论条件期望加权回归。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要强调真实协变量分布在两类建模中均需认真处理,并提出对给定观测值的真实协变量条件期望进行加权回归这一途径。
阅读关注点
应核对协变量误差模型的强假设、真实剂量分布如何确定,以及条件期望替代和加权步骤在非正态与乘性误差下的适用范围。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;作者明确暂用较强误差假设,具体识别和稳健性未说明,不能推出一般剂量因果效应。

原文摘要

Some basic issues in the errors-in-variables problem are discussed, in terms of considerations that arose in analyses of radiation effects on atomic bomb survivors. The setting essentially involves generalized linear models for the response variables, a very nonnormal distribution of the true covariable, and multiplicative errors in the observed covariable. Consideration is given to distinctions between structural and functional modeling. It is argued that careful attention to the apparent distribution of true covariables is critical in either case, and a quasi-structural approach to functional models is suggested. The focus is on the case in which the expected response is linear in the true covariable and strong assumptions are tentatively made about the model for covariate errors. For settings such as just described, which differ from that of much of the classical work in the area, it is emphasized that an attractive approach is based on weighted regression of the response on the expected values of the true covariable, given the observed values.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文