The Errors-in-Variables Problem: Considerations Provided by Radiation Dose-Response Analyses of the A-Bomb Survivor Data
测量误差问题:原子弹幸存者辐射剂量反应分析的启示AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:这里的结构型建模指测量误差统计模型,摘要没有经济行为结构估计或因果识别的直接证据。
反馈分类问题测量误差问题:原子弹幸存者辐射剂量反应分析的启示AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Some basic issues in the errors-in-variables problem are discussed, in terms of considerations that arose in analyses of radiation effects on atomic bomb survivors. The setting essentially involves generalized linear models for the response variables, a very nonnormal distribution of the true covariable, and multiplicative errors in the observed covariable. Consideration is given to distinctions between structural and functional modeling. It is argued that careful attention to the apparent distribution of true covariables is critical in either case, and a quasi-structural approach to functional models is suggested. The focus is on the case in which the expected response is linear in the true covariable and strong assumptions are tentatively made about the model for covariate errors. For settings such as just described, which differ from that of much of the classical work in the area, it is emphasized that an attractive approach is based on weighted regression of the response on the expected values of the true covariable, given the observed values.