Statistical inference of lead-lag at various timescales between asynchronous time series from p-values of transfer entropy
基于转移熵 p 值推断异步时间序列在不同尺度上的领先滞后关系AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究异步序列的领先滞后检验,并明确应用于股票逐笔价格变化,对应时间序列和高频计量。
基于转移熵 p 值推断异步时间序列在不同尺度上的领先滞后关系AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Symbolic transfer entropy is a powerful non-parametric tool to detect lead-lag between time series. Because a closed expression of the distribution of Transfer Entropy is not known for finite-size samples, statistical testing is often performed with bootstraps whose slowness prevents the inference of large lead-lag networks between long time series. On the other hand, the asymptotic distribution of Transfer Entropy between two time series is known. In this work, we derive the asymptotic distribution of the test for one time series having a larger Transfer Entropy than another one on a target time series. We then measure the convergence speed of both tests in the small sample size limits via benchmarks. We then introduce Transfer Entropy between time-shifted time series, which allows to measure the timescale at which information transfer is maximal and vanishes. We finally apply these methods to tick-by-tick price changes of several hundreds of stocks, yielding non-trivial statistically validated networks.