The likelihood dominance criterion
似然支配准则AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要提出通用模型选择和似然比较准则,未明确给出与所列微观、宏观或金融细分对应的研究对象,因此留空。
反馈分类问题似然支配准则AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
The dominance ordering and the LDC provide a new approach to model selection. The dominance ordering is described in terms of a fictive experiment in which the two competing hypotheses are nested in a composite. If estimating the composite would lead to accepting one hypothesis and rejecting the other, then which would be accepted and which rejected is determined by the two adjusted likelihood values and does not require estimating the composite, although it does require specifying its parametric size. The LDC generalizes the dominance ordering by considering a range of admissible composite parametric sizes. This range will usually include all sizes of practical interest.