跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要围绕招聘计数数据的变点检验与法律应用,未描述因果识别、离散选择模型或宏观结构变化,所给分类缺乏直接对应项。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Boris Freidlin

面向就业歧视案件招聘数据分析的变点检验

研究问题
如何检验就业歧视案件中招聘行为是否随时间发生变化,并区分投诉前后时期,以分析与法律责任认定更相关的招聘实践?
方法与思路
作者扩展基于累积和的变点程序以处理超几何模型及分层数据;因年度观测的大样本近似不够准确,以模拟计算统计量的p值。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称将既有二项招聘数据程序扩展至超几何与分层数据,分析多组提交法院的数据,并利用改进的Bonferroni不等式给出新的上界。
阅读关注点
核对二项与超几何抽样机制的差别、分层处理和变点定位方式,以及模拟p值与Bonferroni上界的计算对象及误差。
阅读边界
摘要未说明模拟规模、检验功效和各案件的具体结论;检出的招聘变化如何支持法律责任认定,仍需结合全文与案件事实。

原文摘要

When a complaint of discrimination is made, an employer may respond by hiring more minorities. From a legal viewpoint, the practices in effect during the time period prior to the complaint are more relevant for determining liability than those of the postcharge period. In Gay vs. Waiters, the trial judge observed that the data suggested that a change occurred after the charge was filed. Because the data had not been subject to a formal statistical analysis, the court was reluctant to base its decision on this observation. Gastwirth and Freidlin and Gastwirth proposed cumulative-sum-based procedures for the analysis of hiring data following the binomial model. In this article, the procedures are extended to data following the hypergeometric model and to analysis of stratified data. Several datasets that were submitted to the courts in the United States are analyzed by the proposed methods. Because the data are usually reported by year, the ordinary large-sample theory is not sufficiently accurate. Therefore, we obtain the p values of the statistics by simulation. For binomial data, recent improvements in the Bonferroni inequality are used to derive a new upper bound.

笔记与分组