跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要构建工厂投资的经济结构模型,并讨论模型化资本调整成本估计对均衡假设的敏感性,直接关联结构估计。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Aubhik Khan
Julia K. Thomas

特质冲击与非凸性在工厂及总量投资动态中的作用

研究问题
在工厂面临持续共同与特质生产率冲击时,非凸调整成本如何影响工厂投资和总量动态,一般均衡反馈是否改变结论?
方法与思路
作者构建含资本和生产率异质性、非凸调整成本及免付调整成本的小额投资模型,并比较不同均衡设定下的投资动态。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,间歇性投资对总量动态的影响在一般均衡下量化上不重要;给定所用特质冲击时,非凸成本反而抑制间歇性投资。
阅读关注点
应核对生产率过程和成本设定、投资率分布的匹配依据,以及均衡反馈为何改变动态并影响面板调整成本估计。
阅读边界
仅依据所给 OpenAlex 摘要;校准、量化结果与估计细节未说明,结论依赖模型及均衡设定,不能推广为一般经验规律。

原文摘要

We study a model of lumpy investment wherein establishments face persistent shocks to common and plant-specific productivity, and nonconvex adjustment costs lead them to pursue generalized (S, s) investment rules. We allow persistent heterogeneity in both capital and total factor productivity alongside low-level investments exempt from adjustment costs to develop the first model consistent with the cross-sectional distribution of establishment investment rates. Examining the implications of lumpy investment for aggregate dynamics in this setting, we find that they remain substantial when factor supply considerations are ignored, but are quantitatively irrelevant in general equilibrium. The substantial implications of general equilibrium extend beyond the dynamics of aggregate series. While the presence of idiosyncratic shocks makes the time-averaged distribution of plant-level investment rates largely invariant to market-clearing movements in real wages and interest rates, we show that the dynamics of plants' investments differ sharply in their presence. Thus, model-based estimations of capital adjustment costs involving panel data may be quite sensitive to the assumption about equilibrium. Our analysis also offers new insights about how nonconvex adjustment costs influence investment at the plant. When establishments face idiosyncratic productivity shocks consistent with existing estimates, we find that nonconvex costs do not cause lumpy investments, but act to eliminate them.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文