Incorporating Additional Information to Normal Linear Discriminant Rules
在正态线性判别规则中纳入附加信息AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要属于受约束正态分类方法,医学分组判别并未提供归入经济学离散选择方向的依据。
在正态线性判别规则中纳入附加信息AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
The most useful and broadly known rule in the classical two-group linear normal discriminant analysis is Anderson's rule. In this article we propose some alternative procedures that prove useful when prior constraints on the mean vectors are known. These rules are based on new estimators of the difference of means. We prove under mild conditions that the new rules perform better when the common covariance matrix is known. Simulated experiments show that the misclassification errors are lower for the restricted rules defined here in the general case of an unknown covariance matrix. The prior constraints on the mean vector restrict the parameter space to a cone. A family of estimators indexed by a parameter γ, with 0 ≤ γ ≤ 1, is defined using an iterative procedure in such a way that the estimator with a higher value for γ takes values closer to the center of the cone with a greater probability. When γ = 0, the restricted maximum likelihood estimator is given, although the most interesting rule from a theoretical and practical standpoint is obtained when the estimator chosen is given by γ = 1. The usefulness of the proposed rules with real data is demonstrated by their application to two medical examples, the first dealing with heart attack patients and the second dealing with a diabetes dataset. In the former case, restrictions among surviving and nonsurviving patients are used; in the latter, the restrictions arise from differences between the healthy and diabetic populations.