跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要属于受约束正态分类方法,医学分组判别并未提供归入经济学离散选择方向的依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Cristina Rueda
Bonifacio Salvador

在正态线性判别规则中纳入附加信息

研究问题
当两组正态总体的均值向量具有已知先验约束时,如何利用这些约束改进均值差估计和线性判别规则的误分类表现?
方法与思路
作者以锥形参数空间表达均值约束,通过迭代构造不同收缩程度的均值差估计量,再据此建立受约束判别规则。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称共同协方差已知时在所给条件下证明规则改善;协方差未知时,较低误分类率的证据来自模拟和医学例示。
阅读关注点
应核对均值约束的来源和正确性、理论比较所用损失,以及已知协方差证明与未知协方差模拟结论之间的区别。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;理论优势有协方差已知等条件,摘要未说明约束错误时的风险和表现。

原文摘要

The most useful and broadly known rule in the classical two-group linear normal discriminant analysis is Anderson's rule. In this article we propose some alternative procedures that prove useful when prior constraints on the mean vectors are known. These rules are based on new estimators of the difference of means. We prove under mild conditions that the new rules perform better when the common covariance matrix is known. Simulated experiments show that the misclassification errors are lower for the restricted rules defined here in the general case of an unknown covariance matrix. The prior constraints on the mean vector restrict the parameter space to a cone. A family of estimators indexed by a parameter γ, with 0 ≤ γ ≤ 1, is defined using an iterative procedure in such a way that the estimator with a higher value for γ takes values closer to the center of the cone with a greater probability. When γ = 0, the restricted maximum likelihood estimator is given, although the most interesting rule from a theoretical and practical standpoint is obtained when the estimator chosen is given by γ = 1. The usefulness of the proposed rules with real data is demonstrated by their application to two medical examples, the first dealing with heart attack patients and the second dealing with a diabetes dataset. In the former case, restrictions among surviving and nonsurviving patients are used; in the latter, the restrictions arise from differences between the healthy and diabetic populations.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文