Optimal Permutation Tests for the Analysis of Group Randomized Trials
群组随机试验分析的最优置换检验AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究随机分配干预的群组试验及干预效应检验。
群组随机试验分析的最优置换检验AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Two facts complicate the comparison of interventions in group randomized trials (GRT's), a family of clinical trials in which each member of a particular group receives the same treatment assignment. First, individual outcomes within each group are often correlated. Second, the number of groups in a GRT is often not sufficient to make asymptotic approximations possible. Therefore, the tests used with methods, such as generalized estimating equations (GEE) and penalized quasi likelihood (PQL), originally developed for longitudinal studies, may not be valid. As an alternative, a class of permutation tests is derived to maximize the power of testing for an intervention effect in a GRT while maintaining a nominal test size. The test uses a statistic that is a weighted sum of residuals, with the weights based on the group sizes and the variability of each individual outcome. Through simulation, we demonstrate the importance of weights to a permutation test's power and compare the power of permutation tests, GEE, and PQL. Last, we apply our methods to an actual GRT to study smoking cessation, discuss the findings based on permutation tests, and compare those findings with traditional methods.