跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究离散选择概率、需求限制与价格变化的 Hicks 福利,并以行为模型开展部分识别,直接对应离散选择和结构分析。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Ying-Ying Lee

收入区间数据下离散选择的应用福利分析

研究问题
当收入仅以区间报告、选择概率及福利分布无法点识别时,如何评估假想价格变化导致的平均 Hicks 福利并进行推断?
方法与思路
作者在正常品假设下推导平均福利界限,利用对平均需求线性的 Slutsky 类限制和参数化选择概率,并据方向可微性进行 bootstrap 推断。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,获得福利界限及便于计算的推断方法,提出线性需求形状限制,并讨论误设下的最佳参数近似及更一般的集合识别应用。
阅读关注点
应核对正常品假设与形状限制的作用、区间收入如何形成福利界限,以及方向可微推断和模型误设时目标参数的解释。
阅读边界
仅据所列出版社摘要,界限是否尖锐、参数设定及比较数值未说明;应用采用人为区间化收入,不能据此保证所有调查中的表现。

原文摘要

This paper concerns empirical measurement of Hicksian consumer welfare under interval-reported income. Bhattacharya (2015, 2018a) has shown that for discrete choice, welfare distributions resulting from a hypothetical price-change can be expressed as closed-form transformations of choice probabilities. However, when income is interval-reported, as is the case in many surveys, the choice probabilities, and hence welfare distributions are not point-identified. We derive bounds on average welfare in such scenarios under the assumption of a normal good. A finding of independent interest is a set of Slutsky-like shape restrictions which are linear in average demand, unlike those for continuous choice. A parametric specification of choice probabilities facilitates imposition of these Slutsky conditions, and leads to computationally simple inference for the partially identified features of welfare. In particular, the estimand is shown to be directionally differentiable, so that recently developed bootstrap methods can be applied for inference. Under mis-specification, our results provide a ”best parametric approximation” to demand and welfare. These methods can be used for inference in more general settings where a class of set-identified functions satisfy linear inequality restrictions, and one wishes to conduct inference on functionals thereof. We illustrate our theoretical results using a simulation exercise based on a real dataset where actual income is observed. We artificially introduce interval-censoring of income, calculate bounds for the average welfare effects of a price-subsidy using our methods, and find that they perform favorably in comparison with estimates obtained using actual income.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文