Nonparametric methods for group testing data, taking dilution into account
考虑稀释效应的组检测数据非参数方法AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究医学混合样本检测中的非参数估计,未明确对应所列经济或金融领域细分。
考虑稀释效应的组检测数据非参数方法AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Group testing methods are used widely to assess the presence of a contaminant, based on measurements of the concentration of a biomarker, for example to test the presence of a disease in pooled blood samples. The test would be perfect if it produced a positive result whenever the contaminant was present, and a negative result otherwise. However, in practice the test is always at least somewhat imperfect, for example because it is sensitive to the proportion of contaminated items in the group, rather than to the sheer existence of one or more contaminated items. We develop a nonparametric method for accommodating this dilution effect. Our approach allows us to estimate, under minimal assumptions, the probability |$m(x)$| that an item is contaminated, conditional on the value |$x$| of an explanatory variable, and to estimate the probability, |$q$|, that an individual chosen at random is disease free, and the specificity Sp, and the sensitivity Se, of the test. These are all ill-posed problems, where poor convergence rates are usually encountered, but despite this, our estimators of |$q$|, Sp and Se are root-|$N$| consistent, where |$N$| denotes the total number of individuals in all the groups, and our estimator of |$m(x)$| converges at the rate it would enjoy if |$q$|, Sp and Se were known.