A note on approximate Bayesian bootstrap imputation
近似贝叶斯自助法插补的一则说明AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用缺失数据插补及方差估计,未明确对应所列经济计量细分方向。
近似贝叶斯自助法插补的一则说明AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
The approximate Bayesian bootstrap is suggested by Rubin & Schenker (1986) as a way of generating multiple imputations when the original sample can be regarded as independently and identically distributed and the response mechanism is ignorable. We investigate the finite sample properties of the variance estimator when the approximate Bayesian bootstrap method is used and show that the bias is not negligible for moderate sample sizes. A modification of the method is proposed for reducing the bias of the variance estimator. The proposed method is asymptotically equivalent to the approximate Bayesian bootstrap method but has better finite sample properties.