跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用稳健惩罚回归;选择指标中的措辞不足以证明它属于因果推断。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Xueqin Wang
Yunlu Jiang
Mian Huang
Heping Zhang

基于指数平方损失的稳健变量选择

研究问题
如何在惩罚回归中同时进行变量选择与稳健估计,并明确刻画响应异常值和协变量异常值对估计的影响?
方法与思路
作者提出基于指数平方损失的惩罚回归估计,分析预言性质、崩溃点和影响函数,并开展异常点模拟与数据重分析。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称估计量在条件下具有预言性质、最高二分之一渐近崩溃点及有界影响函数;部分模拟指标接近预言基准。
阅读关注点
应核对损失调参、惩罚形式、异常点机制与算法求解,查清稳健性条件及选择指标定义,并核验缺失公式对应的性质。
阅读边界
仅据所给 OpenAlex 摘要版本,不能推断刊本变化。收敛性质公式缺失,须查原文;选择率表述不清,不能补写速率或将变量选择解释为因果发现。

原文摘要

Robust variable selection procedures through penalized regression have been gaining increased attention in the literature. They can be used to perform variable selection and are expected to yield robust estimates. However, to the best of our knowledge, the robustness of those penalized regression procedures has not been well characterized. In this paper, we propose a class of penalized robust regression estimators based on exponential squared loss. The motivation for this new procedure is that it enables us to characterize its robustness that has not been done for the existing procedures, while its performance is near optimal and superior to some recently developed methods. Specifically, under defined regularity conditions, our estimators are [Formula: see text] and possess the oracle property. Importantly, we show that our estimators can achieve the highest asymptotic breakdown point of 1/2 and that their influence functions are bounded with respect to the outliers in either the response or the covariate domain. We performed simulation studies to compare our proposed method with some recent methods, using the oracle method as the benchmark. We consider common sources of influential points. Our simulation studies reveal that our proposed method performs similarly to the oracle method in terms of the model error and the positive selection rate even in the presence of influential points. In contrast, other existing procedures have a much lower non-causal selection rate. Furthermore, we re-analyze the Boston Housing Price Dataset and the Plasma Beta-Carotene Level Dataset that are commonly used examples for regression diagnostics of influential points. Our analysis unravels the discrepancies of using our robust method versus the other penalized regression method, underscoring the importance of developing and applying robust penalized regression methods.

笔记与分组