Pseudo–Empirical Likelihood Inference for Multiple Frame Surveys
多抽样框调查的伪经验似然推断AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦多抽样框调查及有限总体推断,未直接对应所列领域细分。
多抽样框调查的伪经验似然推断AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
This article presents a pseudo–empirical likelihood approach to inference for multiple-frame surveys. We establish a unified framework for point and interval estimation of finite population parameters, and show that inferences on the parameters of interest making effective use of different types of auxiliary population information can be conveniently carried out through the constrained maximization of the pseudo–empirical likelihood function. Confidence intervals are constructed using either the asymptotic χ2 distribution of an adjusted pseudo–empirical likelihood ratio statistic or a bootstrap calibration method. Simulation results based on Statistics Canada’s Family Expenditure Survey data show that the proposed methods perform well in finite samples for both point and interval estimation. In particular, a multiplicity-based pseudo–empirical likelihood method is proposed. This method is easily used for multiple-frame surveys with more than two frames and does not require complete frame membership information. The proposed pseudo–empirical likelihood ratio confidence intervals have a clear advantage over the conventional normal approximation–based intervals in estimating population proportions of rare items, a scenario that often motivates the use of multiple-frame surveys. All related computational problems can be handled using existing algorithms for pseudo–empirical likelihood methods with single-frame surveys.