The fixed- b limiting distribution and the ERP of HAR tests under nonstationarity
非平稳条件下 HAR 检验的 fixed-b 极限分布与拒绝概率误差AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要围绕时变自协方差、序列依赖及长期方差稳健时间序列检验展开。
非平稳条件下 HAR 检验的 fixed-b 极限分布与拒绝概率误差AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
We show that the limiting distribution of HAR test statistics under fixed-b asymptotics is not pivotal when the data are nonstationary (i.e., time-varying autocovariance structure). It takes the form of a complicated function of Gaussian processes and depends on the second moments of the relevant series (e.g., of the regressors and errors for the case of the linear regression model). Hence, fixed-b inference methods based on stationarity are not theoretically valid in general. The nuisance parameters entering the fixed-b limiting distribution can be consistently estimated under small-b asymptotics but only with nonparametric rate of convergence. We show that the error in rejection probability (ERP) is an order of magnitude larger than that under stationarity and can be also larger than that of HAR tests based on HAC estimators under conventional asymptotics. These theoretical results reconcile with recent finite-sample evidence showing that existing fixed-b HAR tests can perform poorly when the data are nonstationary. They can be conservative under the null hypothesis and have non-monotonic power under the alternative hypothesis irrespective of how large the sample size is. Based on the new nonstationary fixed-b distribution, we propose a feasible method that controls the null rejection rates well regardless of whether the data are stationary or not and of the strength of the serial dependence as verified for some representative data-generating processes in a simple location model.