Estimation of wage inequality in the UK by quantile regression with censored selection
利用删失选择分位数回归估计英国工资不平等AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接使用分位数选择模型分析工资分布、不平等与性别工资差距。
利用删失选择分位数回归估计英国工资不平等AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Arellano and Bonhomme (2017) proposed a quantile selection model to study the evolution of wage inequality in the UK, which specifies a binary selection equation and requires an exclusion restriction. In this paper we propose a quantile selection model with a more informative censored selection equation. Following Heckman (1974, 1979), Heckman and Sedlacek (1990), and Blundell et al. (2003), among others, the employment selection equation could be equivalently modeled by an hours worked equation through a censored selection. In our model, both the outcome and selection equations are specified as semiparametric quantile regressions, and no exclusion restriction is needed. We propose a quantile selection estimator that was applied to study wage inequality using the same data as in Arellano and Bonhomme (2017). Among our major findings based on our method, after adjusting for sample selection, (i) there is significant negative selection among males, in contrast to the finding of significant positive selection by Arellano and Bonhomme (2017); (ii) similar to Arellano and Bonhomme (2017), we also find positive selection for females, but our selection effects are more significant than those of Arellano and Bonhomme (2017) (See Section 5 for more details); (iii) the gender wage gap has remained large and accounting for selection leads to much smaller reduction in the gender wage gap over time, compared with the observed wage distribution and that of Arellano and Bonhomme (2017).