Group Comparison of Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors of Diffusion Tensors
扩散张量特征值与特征向量的组间比较AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论医学影像矩阵参数的组间检验与多重比较,未直接涉及所列经济或金融计量细分,故保留空分类。
扩散张量特征值与特征向量的组间比较AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data differ from most medical images in that values at each voxel are not scalars, but 3 × 3 symmetric positive definite matrices called diffusion tensors (DTs). The anatomic characteristics of the tissue at each voxel are reflected by the DT eigenvalues and eigenvectors. In this article we consider the problem of testing whether the means of two groups of DT images are equal at each voxel in terms of the DT's eigenvalues, eigenvectors, or both. Because eigendecompositions are highly nonlinear, existing likelihood ratio statistics (LRTs) for testing differences in eigenvalues or eigenvectors of means of Gaussian symmetric matrices assume an orthogonally invariant covariance structure between the matrix entries. While retaining the form of the LRTs, we derive new approximations to their true distributions when the covariance between the DT entries is arbitrary and possibly different between the two groups. The approximate distributions are those of similar LRT statistics computed on the tangent space to the parameter manifold at the true value of the parameter, but plugging in an estimate for the point of application of the tangent space. The resulting distributions, which are weighted sums of chi-squared distributions, are further approximated by scaled chi-squared distributions by matching the first two moments. For validity of the Gaussian model, the positive definite constraints on the DT are removed via a matrix log transformation, although this is not crucial asymptotically. Voxelwise application of the test statistics leads to a multiple-testing problem, which is solved by false discovery rate inference. The foregoing methods are illustrated in a DTI group comparison of boys versus girls.